Skip to content
Neighborhood · Colesville, MD

Fairknoll Eviction Risk: Moderate

1 census tracts · pop 8,350 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.8/10 · range 5.8–5.8

Fairknoll is a one-tract neighborhood of Colesville, MD, population 8,350. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 5.8/10, Moderate tier. Severe burden reaches 40%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears.

What pushes the score up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.6/10. Running cool is supply constraint, at 1/10.

At $1,372 a month, rents sit 28% under what the rest of Colesville commands. On the softer side is economic stress, at 1.4/10.

Rent consumes at least 30% of income for about half of renter households. Among the 4 mapped neighborhoods of Colesville, it ranks #1 by risk, the upper third. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin here; price renewals off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

For a like-for-like read, Rocky Brook Park and East Springbrook score within a fraction of it. Rent takes 15% of average household income, comfortably inside the 30% line and unusually low for a rental sub-market. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 5.8/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Fairknoll vs Colesville How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
49.7% -3%
Colesville: 51.0%
Average gross rent
$1,372 -28%
Colesville: $1,893
Average HH income
$111,795 -15%
Colesville: $131,022
Poverty rate
5.5% +5%
Colesville: 5.3%
Renter share
14.3% -16%
Colesville: 17.0%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Fairknoll and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 5.8–5.8

Why Fairknoll scores 5.8

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 5.7–5.7 across tracts
5.7
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 8.0–8.0 across tracts
8.0
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 7.5–7.5 across tracts
7.5
Rent control risk
50% of income on rent · Range 9.6–9.6 across tracts
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 5.8–5.8 across tracts
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
14% renter households · Range 3.8–3.8 across tracts
3.8
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 6.4–6.4 across tracts
6.4
Economic stress
5.5% below poverty line · Range 1.4–1.4 across tracts
1.4
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Risk score comparison

Fairknoll vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Fairknoll score vs. parent city, state, U.S.5.8FairknollNeighborhood5.9Parent cityhost city5.5Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Fairknoll

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
24031701415 5.8 8,350 50% $1,372
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 37

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 41%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 65%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 83%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 10%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Fairknoll

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Fairknoll

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Fairknoll?

Fairknoll scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Fairknoll compare to Colesville overall?

Fairknoll scores 0.1 points lower than Colesville overall (5.9/10). Renters spend 50% of income on rent vs 51% citywide. Average rent: $1,372 vs $1,893.
Q3

What is the average rent in Fairknoll?

Average gross rent in Fairknoll is $1,372/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Fairknoll residents are renters?

14% of Fairknoll households are renter-occupied (vs 17% in Colesville). The neighborhood has 8,350 residents.
Q5

Is Fairknoll a high social-vulnerability area?

Fairknoll sits in the 37th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Fairknoll for landlords?

Fairknoll carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.8/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Colesville as a whole (5.9/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Fairknoll?

Fairknoll has 8,437 residents. Top groups: Black (non-Hispanic) (37.6%), Hispanic / Latino (21.1%), White (non-Hispanic) (20.9%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Fairknoll

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Colesville

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Fairknoll.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further