Skip to content
South Lancaster, Massachusetts eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,177 residents

South Lancaster, MA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Worcester County · Population 2,177

In 2026
Risk score
6.2
ELEVATED

94th percentile, Massachusetts.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.4 Average4.2 Now6.2
7.4 2.4 1976 · score 3.0 1977 · score 2.9 1978 · score 2.9 1979 · score 2.9 1980 · score 2.9 1981 · score 2.9 1982 · score 2.9 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 3.0 1991 · score 3.1 1992 · score 3.6 1993 · score 3.5 1994 · score 3.7 1995 · score 3.5 1996 · score 4.0 1997 · score 4.1 1998 · score 4.1 1999 · score 4.2 2000 · score 4.1 2001 · score 4.2 2002 · score 4.3 2003 · score 4.3 2004 · score 4.3 2005 · score 4.3 2006 · score 4.4 2007 · score 4.4 2008 · score 4.6 2009 · score 4.8 2010 · score 4.9 2011 · score 4.9 2012 · score 4.8 2013 · score 4.8 2014 · score 4.9 2015 · score 4.9 2016 · score 5.1 2017 · score 5.2 2018 · score 5.3 2019 · score 5.4 2020 · score 7.3 2021 · score 7.4 2022 · score 6.4 2023 · score 6.1 2024 · score 6.5 2025 · score 6.3 2026 · score 6.2

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.3 Regional 6.3 State 6.2 Economic 6.2 Supply 5.7 Rent Control 8.6 Eviction 5.9 Tenant 5.7 Housing 5.7 6.2 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +10.0% (2024)
    6.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.3
  3. State political climate
    Massachusetts legislature & governorship
    6.2
  4. Economic stress
    4.1% poverty · 17.1% unemp.
    6.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,893 average · 25.7% renters
    5.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    37.6% of income on rent
    8.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    218 days filing → judgment
    5.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    25.7% renters
    5.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across South Lancaster and the region

Click any city to see its score

How South Lancaster compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Worcester County
High
#6 of 35 cities
Rank in county, 85th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 35 cities in Worcester County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Massachusetts
High
#26 of 248 cities
Rank in state, 90th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 248 cities in Massachusetts for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
South Lancaster risk score vs. county / state / U.S.South Lancaster: 6.26.2South LancasterThis cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg in countyState: 6.26.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.2
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 218d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,893/mo. A contested eviction takes 218 days and costs $10,362–$27,775 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 25.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,177 residents, 25.7% rent. 38% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 4.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.3 and 6.3 (Dem margin +10.0% (2024)). State climate at 6.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.9, housing court bias 5.7, rent-control risk 8.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.2. Supply constraint: 5.7. The numbers behind those: 4.1% poverty, 17.1% unemployment, 38% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

South Lancaster sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Worcester, MA · 184d · ~$19.8k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.4 Worcester Springfield, MA · 191d · ~$20.6k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.7 Springfield Cambridge, MA · 212d · ~$19.8k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Cambridge Lowell, MA · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.1 Lowell Brockton, MA · 207d · ~$19.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Brockton Quincy, MA · 216d · ~$18.5k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.2 Quincy Lynn, MA · 195d · ~$20.6k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Lynn Newton, MA · 200d · ~$18.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 5.6 Newton Lawrence, MA · 188d · ~$17.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Lawrence Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle South Lancaster
South Lancaster · 218d · ~$19.1k all-in ($87/day) · score 6.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in South Lancaster, MA

Landlording in South Lancaster, Massachusetts, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.2/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

South Lancaster is a city of 2,177 residents where 25.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 37.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,893/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How South Lancaster eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in South Lancaster closes 218 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of South Lancaster's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in South Lancaster runs $10,362 to $27,775 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 218 days of typical timeline and $1,893/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.7/10 in South Lancaster, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Massachusetts, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in South Lancaster: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Massachusetts's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $27,775 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in South Lancaster

Trap · 4.1%
Local poverty rate is 4.1%, and the rent-burden distribution skews the eviction-filings curve toward higher volume in Worcester County. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 8.6/10. Tenant organizing is most active in the rental concentration corridors.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for being a few days late on rent?

No, not immediately. In Massachusetts, you must issue a 14-day pay-or-quit notice for non-payment of rent. The tenant has those 14 days to pay the full amount due. If they pay within that window, you cannot proceed with an eviction based on that late payment.

Q2

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the eviction is granted by the court?

If the court grants you possession, you will receive an "Execution for Possession." You then must hire a constable or sheriff to physically remove the tenant and their belongings. You cannot do this yourself. This is the final step in the eviction process and requires proper legal channels.

Q3

Is rent control a risk in South Lancaster?

Massachusetts currently has no statewide rent control, and local municipalities cannot enact it without state approval. However, our data shows a rent-control-risk sub-score of 8.6/10 for South Lancaster. This means there's a higher potential for future legislative action at the state level that could introduce rent control or similar tenant protections. Stay informed about Massachusetts rent control rules.

Q4

How can I best screen tenants to avoid eviction?

Beyond credit and background checks, focus heavily on verifying income (aim for 3x rent) and, most previous landlord references. Ask specific questions about payment history, property care, and whether the landlord would re-rent to them. Don't skip these steps. Our screening protocol that prevents evictions provides a detailed guide.

Q5

What's the most common mistake landlords make during an eviction in Massachusetts?

The most common mistake is failing to follow the precise legal procedures for notices and court filings. Massachusetts landlord-tenant law is very specific. Any misstep, like incorrect notice periods, improper service, or errors in court documents, can lead to your case being dismissed and having to start all over again, costing you more time and money.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.2/10 places South Lancaster in the 94th percentile of Massachusetts cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.