Skip to content
Ponshewaing, Michigan eviction risk overview
City brief · 61 residents

Ponshewaing, MI Eviction Risk: LOW

Emmet County · Population 61

In 2026
Risk score
3.1
LOW

4th percentile, Michigan.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.7 Average3.1 Now3.1
4.3 2.7 1976 · score 2.7 1977 · score 2.7 1978 · score 2.9 1979 · score 2.9 1980 · score 3.0 1981 · score 3.0 1982 · score 3.1 1983 · score 3.0 1984 · score 3.0 1985 · score 2.9 1986 · score 3.0 1987 · score 3.0 1988 · score 3.1 1989 · score 3.0 1990 · score 3.0 1991 · score 3.0 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.0 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.0 1999 · score 3.0 2000 · score 3.0 2001 · score 3.0 2002 · score 3.1 2003 · score 3.1 2004 · score 3.1 2005 · score 3.0 2006 · score 3.1 2007 · score 3.1 2008 · score 3.1 2009 · score 3.3 2010 · score 3.2 2011 · score 3.1 2012 · score 3.1 2013 · score 3.1 2014 · score 3.1 2015 · score 3.1 2016 · score 3.1 2017 · score 3.1 2018 · score 3.1 2019 · score 3.1 2020 · score 3.9 2021 · score 4.3 2022 · score 3.3 2023 · score 3.1 2024 · score 3.1 2025 · score 3.1 2026 · score 3.1

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.0 Regional 5.0 State 3.3 Economic 1.0 Supply 1.0 Rent Control 2.1 Eviction 3.5 Tenant 1.0 Housing 2.3 3.1 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +10.8% (2024)
    5.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.0
  3. State political climate
    Michigan legislature & governorship
    3.3
  4. Economic stress
    11.0% poverty · 3.1% unemp.
    1.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $930 average · 32.8% renters
    1.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.3% of income on rent
    2.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    62 days filing → judgment
    3.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    32.8% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ponshewaing and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Ponshewaing compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Emmet County
Very Low
#13 of 13 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 13 cities in Emmet County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Michigan
Very Low
#738 of 743 cities
Rank in state, 1st percentileLowHigh
#738 of 743 cities in Michigan for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Ponshewaing risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Ponshewaing: 3.13.1PonshewaingThis cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avg

Michigan landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Michigan statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.1
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 62d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $930/mo. A contested eviction takes 62 days and costs $2,412–$6,857 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 32.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 61 residents, 32.8% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 11.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5 and 5 (GOP margin +10.8% (2024)). State climate at 3.3, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.3
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.3/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 3.5, housing court bias 2.3, rent-control risk 2.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.5 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 1. Supply constraint: 1. The numbers behind those: 11.0% poverty, 3.1% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Ponshewaing sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Detroit, MI · 62d · ~$4.9k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.6 Detroit Grand Rapids, MI · 54d · ~$4.7k all-in ($88/day) · score 4 Grand Rapids Warren, MI · 65d · ~$4.5k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.4 Warren Sterling Heights, MI · 56d · ~$4.7k all-in ($83/day) · score 3.4 Sterling Heights Ann Arbor, MI · 55d · ~$4.3k all-in ($77/day) · score 5.8 Ann Arbor Lansing, MI · 64d · ~$4.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 4 Lansing Dearborn, MI · 56d · ~$4.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 4.4 Dearborn Livonia, MI · 62d · ~$5.0k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.6 Livonia Troy, MI · 59d · ~$4.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 4 Troy Westland, MI · 57d · ~$4.7k all-in ($82/day) · score 4.2 Westland Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Ponshewaing
Ponshewaing · 62d · ~$4.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Ponshewaing, MI

Landlording in Ponshewaing, Michigan, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.1/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Ponshewaing is a city of 61 residents where 32.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $930/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Ponshewaing eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 3.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Ponshewaing closes 62 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Ponshewaing's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Ponshewaing runs $2,412 to $6,857 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 62 days of typical timeline and $930/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in Ponshewaing, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Michigan, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Ponshewaing: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Michigan's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $6,857 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Ponshewaing

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Ponshewaing reflects the demographic and political composition of Emmet County, with eviction procedure governed at the state level. Emmet County 2020 margin: R+11.2.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Ponshewaing without a reason?

Michigan does not have statewide just-cause eviction requirements. For a month-to-month lease, you can generally terminate the tenancy with a 30-day notice without stating a specific reason, as long as it's not discriminatory or retaliatory. For a fixed-term lease, you can only evict for a lease violation unless the lease specifically allows early termination.

Q2

What if my tenant damages the property beyond the security deposit?

If the cost of damages exceeds the security deposit, you can sue the tenant in small claims court for the remaining balance. Keep detailed records, photos, and receipts for all repairs to support your claim. This is a separate legal action from the eviction itself.

Q3

How long does it take for the sheriff to remove a tenant after an eviction order?

Once the judge issues an Order of Eviction, there's typically a grace period, often 10 days, before you can request the sheriff to physically remove the tenant. The actual timing for the sheriff depends on their schedule and availability in Emmet County, but it's usually within a few days of your request after the grace period expires.

Q4

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Ponshewaing?

While you can represent yourself in court, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney, especially if the tenant contests the eviction. A lawyer ensures all notices are correct, court procedures are followed, and your case is presented effectively, saving you time and potential costly mistakes. Given the typical eviction cost range, a lawyer's fee can be a worthwhile investment.

Q5

What are the common mistakes landlords make during an eviction?

The most common mistakes include improper notice (wrong timeframe, incorrect information), attempting self-help eviction (changing locks, turning off utilities), not having proper documentation, and failing to appear in court. Any of these can lead to your case being dismissed and restarting the entire process, costing you more time and money.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.1/10 places Ponshewaing in the 4th percentile of Michigan cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.