Skip to content
Mio, Michigan eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,474 residents

Mio, MI Eviction Risk: LOW

Oscoda County · Population 1,474

In 2026
Risk score
3.4
LOW

94th percentile, Michigan.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average2.8 Now3.4
4.4 1.8 1976 · score 2.2 1977 · score 2.1 1978 · score 2.1 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.3 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.3 1984 · score 2.3 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.2 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.8 1990 · score 1.9 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.5 1993 · score 2.4 1994 · score 2.4 1995 · score 2.4 1996 · score 2.6 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 2.6 2001 · score 2.7 2002 · score 2.8 2003 · score 2.8 2004 · score 2.7 2005 · score 2.8 2006 · score 2.8 2007 · score 2.9 2008 · score 3.5 2009 · score 3.7 2010 · score 3.7 2011 · score 3.7 2012 · score 3.6 2013 · score 3.5 2014 · score 3.4 2015 · score 3.3 2016 · score 3.2 2017 · score 3.2 2018 · score 3.2 2019 · score 3.1 2020 · score 4.4 2021 · score 4.4 2022 · score 3.5 2023 · score 3.1 2024 · score 3.4 2025 · score 3.4 2026 · score 3.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.5 Regional 3.5 State 3.3 Economic 8.6 Supply 3.4 Rent Control 5.3 Eviction 3.5 Tenant 5.3 Housing 6.6 3.4 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +44.3% (2024)
    3.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.5
  3. State political climate
    Michigan legislature & governorship
    3.3
  4. Economic stress
    20.5% poverty · 13.0% unemp.
    8.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $584 average · 22.7% renters
    3.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.2% of income on rent
    5.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    61 days filing → judgment
    3.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    22.7% renters
    5.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mio and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Mio compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Oscoda County
Moderate
#1 of 1 cities
Rank in county, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 cities in Oscoda County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Michigan
High
#83 of 743 cities
Rank in state, 89th percentileLowHigh
#83 of 743 cities in Michigan for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Mio risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Mio: 3.43.4MioThis cityCounty: 3.43.4Countyavg in countyState: 3.33.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.4
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 61d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $584/mo. A contested eviction takes 61 days and costs $2,617–$5,997 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 22.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,474 residents, 22.7% rent. 31% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 20.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.5 and 3.5 (GOP margin +44.3% (2024)). State climate at 3.3, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.3
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.3/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 3.5, housing court bias 6.6, rent-control risk 5.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 8.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8.6. Supply constraint: 3.4. The numbers behind those: 20.5% poverty, 13.0% unemployment, 31% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Mio sits in the slow but cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Detroit, MI · 62d · ~$4.9k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.4 Detroit Grand Rapids, MI · 54d · ~$4.7k all-in ($88/day) · score 3.5 Grand Rapids Warren, MI · 65d · ~$4.5k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.5 Warren Sterling Heights, MI · 56d · ~$4.7k all-in ($83/day) · score 3.2 Sterling Heights Ann Arbor, MI · 55d · ~$4.3k all-in ($77/day) · score 3.6 Ann Arbor Lansing, MI · 64d · ~$4.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 3.7 Lansing Dearborn, MI · 56d · ~$4.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.4 Dearborn Livonia, MI · 62d · ~$5.0k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.1 Livonia Troy, MI · 59d · ~$4.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 2.9 Troy Westland, MI · 57d · ~$4.7k all-in ($82/day) · score 3.1 Westland Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Mio
Mio · 61d · ~$4.3k all-in ($71/day) · score 3.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Mio, MI

Landlording in Mio, Michigan, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.4/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Mio is a city of 1,474 residents where 22.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.2% of income on rent. At an average rent of $584/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Mio eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 3.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Mio closes 61 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Mio's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Mio runs $2,617 to $5,997 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 61 days of typical timeline and $584/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.3/10 in Mio, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Michigan, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Mio: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Michigan's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $5,997 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Mio

Trap · 6.6/10
For landlords, the 4.6/10 score is most actionable when combined with Oscoda County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 6.6/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Mio without a reason?

Michigan law does not require "just cause" for eviction in most cases, particularly for month-to-month tenancies or after a lease term ends. You typically need to give a 30-day notice to terminate the tenancy. However, you cannot evict for discriminatory reasons or in retaliation for a tenant exercising their rights.

Q2

What's the fastest way to get a tenant out in Mio?

The fastest way is almost always through a voluntary agreement, like "cash for keys." If that's not possible, issuing the correct 7-day pay-or-quit notice for non-payment of rent immediately is the next best option. Any delays in notice or filing will prolong the process. Do not attempt self-help eviction (changing locks, shutting off utilities) as this is illegal and will result in significant penalties.

Q3

How much can I charge for a late fee in Mio?

Michigan law does not set a specific cap on late fees. However, the fee must be "reasonable" and should be clearly stated in your lease agreement. A common practice is a flat fee (e.g., $25-$50) or a percentage of the monthly rent (e.g., 5%). Excessive late fees may be challenged in court.

Q4

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Mio?

While you can represent yourself in Michigan District Court, it's highly recommended to hire an attorney, especially if the tenant contests the eviction or raises defenses. An attorney ensures all notices are correct, filings are timely, and you present your case effectively, saving you time and money in the long run. See our general Michigan eviction risk overview for more context.

Q5

What if my tenant damages the property beyond the security deposit amount?

If the cost of damages exceeds the security deposit, you can sue the tenant in small claims court for the difference. You'll need detailed documentation, including move-in/move-out inspection checklists, photos, and receipts for repairs. This is a separate legal action from the eviction itself.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.4/10 places Mio in the 94th percentile of Michigan cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.