Field and Holmes Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln
Tract 31109002100 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 2,483 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 31109002100 sits in the Field and Holmes area of Lincoln eviction risk, NE, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5/10. It is home to 2,483 residents. Severe burden reaches 37%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8064, -96.7166 · click any tract to drill in
Why Field and Holmes scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Field and Holmes compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 55%Household composition
- 55%Racial/ethnic minority
- 83%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 76%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 578Total filings over 14 yrs
- 8.69%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.4%Peak (2013)
- 23Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.9%Housing insecurity
- 10.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 22.6%Food insecurity
- 17.1%SNAP enrollment
- 12.0%Transit barriers
- 15.9%No health insurance
- 18.3%Frequent mental distress
- 31.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Field and Holmes
The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10. The poverty rate is 25%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Against the Lancaster County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. Average gross rent is $898, 17% below the Lincoln average.
The filing record is not thin: 578 evictions over 14 years of observation. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 3/10. Filings peaked in 2013 at 9.4% of renter households.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lincoln. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 8.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 61% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 31109002100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109002100?
What is the average rent in tract 31109002100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109002100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109002100?
Is tract 31109002100 considered part of Field and Holmes?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109002100?
What share of households in tract 31109002100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31109002100 compare to Lincoln overall?
Was tract 31109002100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.