Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Eaton Heights Eviction Risk: Lower , Manchester

Tract 33011001100 · Hillsborough County, NH · pop 5,826 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 33011001100 covers part of the Eaton Heights area of Manchester, NH, and scores 3.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 64% here against 45.2% across Hillsborough County.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 2% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units2,017
Renter share6.2%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate2.7%
Median income$116,058

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Eaton Heights
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 30 tracts In Manchester
Very Low
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#69 of 103 tracts In Hillsborough County
Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#264 of 349 tracts In New Hampshire
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Manchester and the region

Centroid at 42.9813, -71.4223 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eaton Heights scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Manchester
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
2.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,436 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Manchester
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Manchester
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Manchester
3.5

How Eaton Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Eaton Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 0011004.0Manchesterparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eaton Heights

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.5/10. SNAP participation runs 5.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 8.4% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Hillsborough County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.

At $1,436 a month, rents run 8% under what the rest of Manchester commands. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Manchester. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #61,558 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Against average income of $116,058, annual rent is just 15%.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 33011001100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33011001100?

Census tract 33011001100 in the Eaton Heights neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 33011001100?

Median gross rent is $1,436/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 33011001100?

2.7% of residents in tract 33011001100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,826.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 33011001100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 12th, minority 26th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 33011001100 considered part of Eaton Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 33011001100 fall within Eaton Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 33011001100 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 33011001100 compare to Manchester overall?

Tract 33011001100 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Manchester at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Manchester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 33011001100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 12% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Manchester

Top eight tracts in Manchester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related