Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Piscataquog Eviction Risk: Moderate , Manchester

Tract 33011002000 · Hillsborough County, NH · pop 2,405 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Tract 33011002000 covers Piscataquog in Manchester in New Hampshire. Home to 2,405 residents, it scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 42nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,255 a month while the average household earns $42,271 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. Renters make up 78% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42% Stable renters 36% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units960
Renter share77.5%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate21.5%
Median income$42,271

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Piscataquog
Moderate
Within parent city
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 30 tracts In Manchester
Very High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 103 tracts In Hillsborough County
Very High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 349 tracts In New Hampshire
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Manchester and the region

Centroid at 42.9821, -71.4740 · click any tract to drill in

Why Piscataquog scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Manchester
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
21.5% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,255 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Manchester
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Manchester
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Manchester
3.5

How Piscataquog compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Piscataquog risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 002000Manchester: 3.73.7Manchesterparent cityCounty: 2.32.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Piscataquog

What moves this score most is economic stress at 5.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Manchester eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hillsborough County average of 4.7 and in line with the New Hampshire statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 29% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 33011002000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33011002000?

Census tract 33011002000 in the Piscataquog neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 33011002000?

Median gross rent is $1,255/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 33011002000?

21.5% of residents in tract 33011002000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,405.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 33011002000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 80th, minority 54th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 33011002000 considered part of Piscataquog?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 33011002000 fall within Piscataquog (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 33011002000 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 33011002000 compare to Manchester overall?

Tract 33011002000 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Manchester at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Manchester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 33011002000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 29% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Manchester

Top eight tracts in Manchester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related