Skip to content
New California, Ohio eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,672 residents

New California, OH Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Union County · Population 1,672

In 2026
Risk score
2.2
VERY LOW

30th percentile, Ohio.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average2.2 Now2.2
3.5 1.5 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.1 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 2.0 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.8 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 2.2 1997 · score 2.2 1998 · score 2.2 1999 · score 2.2 2000 · score 2.2 2001 · score 2.1 2002 · score 2.2 2003 · score 2.1 2004 · score 2.0 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 1.9 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.4 2009 · score 2.6 2010 · score 2.6 2011 · score 2.6 2012 · score 2.4 2013 · score 2.5 2014 · score 2.4 2015 · score 2.4 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.2 2020 · score 3.4 2021 · score 3.5 2022 · score 2.6 2023 · score 2.3 2024 · score 2.1 2025 · score 2.2 2026 · score 2.2

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.1 Regional 4.1 State 2.4 Economic 2.2 Supply 2.3 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.6 Tenant 2.3 Housing 1.7 2.2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +29.6% (2024)
    4.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.1
  3. State political climate
    Ohio legislature & governorship
    2.4
  4. Economic stress
    8.3% poverty · 1.2% unemp.
    2.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,180 average · 6.8% renters
    2.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.6% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    42 days filing → judgment
    2.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    6.8% renters
    2.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across New California and the region

Click any city to see its score

How New California compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Union County
Low
#6 of 9 cities
Rank in county, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 cities in Union County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Ohio
Low
#969 of 1,251 cities
Rank in state, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#969 of 1,251 cities in Ohio for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
New California risk score vs. county / state / U.S.New California: 2.22.2New CaliforniaThis cityCounty: 2.32.3Countyavg in countyState: 2.82.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 42d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,180/mo. A contested eviction takes 42 days and costs $1,302–$3,982 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 6.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,672 residents, 6.8% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.1 and 4.1 (GOP margin +29.6% (2024)). State climate at 2.4, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.4
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.4/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.6, housing court bias 1.7, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.2. Supply constraint: 2.3. The numbers behind those: 8.3% poverty, 1.2% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

New California sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Columbus, OH · 38d · ~$2.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.1 Columbus Springfield, OH · 42d · ~$2.4k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.8 Springfield Newark, OH · 41d · ~$3.1k all-in ($75/day) · score 2.4 Newark Cleveland, OH · 39d · ~$3.1k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.7 Cleveland Cincinnati, OH · 37d · ~$2.8k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.4 Cincinnati Toledo, OH · 45d · ~$3.0k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.3 Toledo Akron, OH · 43d · ~$2.8k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.4 Akron Dayton, OH · 38d · ~$2.6k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.4 Dayton Parma, OH · 42d · ~$2.9k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.8 Parma Canton, OH · 45d · ~$2.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.8 Canton Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle New California
New California · 42d · ~$2.6k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in New California, OH

Landlording in New California, Ohio, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

New California is a city of 1,672 residents where 6.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,180/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How New California eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in New California closes 42 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of New California's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in New California runs $1,302 to $3,982 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 42 days of typical timeline and $1,180/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.3/10 in New California, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Ohio, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in New California: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Ohio's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,982 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in New California

Trap · 3.3/10
The 3.3/10 score combines local political climate, court bias, cost-of-eviction, tenant organizing strength, and the likelihood of new tenant-protective legislation. See the breakdown above for New California-specific sub-scores.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my New California tenant just disappears?

If they disappear and leave belongings, you still can't just take possession. You generally need to follow the eviction process to legally regain possession. Ohio law has specific rules for abandoned property. You might need to send a notice to their last known address and store their items for a period before disposing of them. Don't assume; follow the law.

Q2

Can I raise the rent whenever I want in New California?

Ohio has no statewide rent control, and New California certainly doesn't. You can raise the rent, but you must provide proper notice, typically 30 days for month-to-month leases. Check your lease for specific terms if it's a fixed-term lease. For more on this, see our Ohio rent control rules guide.

Q3

How often should I inspect my rental property?

Regular inspections are smart. Annually is good, perhaps every six months if you have concerns. Always give proper notice (usually 24 hours) before entering, unless it's an emergency. Document everything with photos. This helps catch issues early and can be crucial evidence if you ever need to evict.

Q4

What if my tenant claims the property is uninhabitable?

Ohio law requires landlords to maintain safe and habitable premises. If a tenant sends you a written notice about a major repair issue (like no heat in winter), you have a reasonable time to fix it. If you don't, they might be able to pay for repairs and deduct from rent, or even break the lease. Address legitimate issues promptly. This is covered under Ohio tenant protections.

Q5

Should I accept partial rent payments during an eviction?

Generally, no. Accepting a partial payment can sometimes "waive" your right to continue the eviction for that month's rent, effectively restarting the process. If you absolutely must accept a partial payment, get a written agreement stating that the eviction process is NOT waived and the remaining balance is still due. Better yet, avoid it entirely and pursue the full amount or the eviction.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.2/10 places New California in the 30th percentile of Ohio cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.