Skip to content
Wedderburn, Oregon eviction risk overview
City brief · 206 residents

Wedderburn, OR Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Curry County · Population 206

In 2026
Risk score
5.8
ELEVATED

16th percentile, Oregon.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.7 Now5.8
6.7 2.3 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.3 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.0 1994 · score 2.9 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.0 1997 · score 3.0 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.1 2000 · score 3.1 2001 · score 3.2 2002 · score 3.3 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.6 2005 · score 3.6 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.6 2008 · score 4.1 2009 · score 4.4 2010 · score 4.4 2011 · score 4.4 2012 · score 4.3 2013 · score 4.3 2014 · score 4.6 2015 · score 4.6 2016 · score 4.5 2017 · score 4.5 2018 · score 4.5 2019 · score 5.5 2020 · score 6.7 2021 · score 6.5 2022 · score 6.3 2023 · score 6.0 2024 · score 6.0 2025 · score 5.8 2026 · score 5.8

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.8 Regional 4.8 State 7.2 Economic 2.3 Supply 9.3 Rent Control 6.4 Eviction 6.3 Tenant 9.3 Housing 5.0 5.8 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +16.1% (2024)
    4.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.8
  3. State political climate
    Oregon legislature & governorship
    7.2
  4. Economic stress
    6.1% poverty · 5.0% unemp.
    2.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,056 average · 16.7% renters
    9.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    61.1% of income on rent
    6.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    151 days filing → judgment
    6.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    16.7% renters
    9.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Wedderburn and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Wedderburn compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Curry County
Very Low
#7 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 cities in Curry County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Oregon
Very Low
#383 of 425 cities
Rank in state, 10th percentileLowHigh
#383 of 425 cities in Oregon for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Wedderburn risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Wedderburn: 5.85.8WedderburnThis cityCounty: 6.26.2Countyavg in countyState: 7.17.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 5.8
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 5.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 151d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,056/mo. A contested eviction takes 151 days and costs $6,292–$17,553 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 16.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 206 residents, 16.7% rent. 61% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 6.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.8 and 4.8 (GOP margin +16.1% (2024)). State climate at 7.2, a tenant-leaning legislature.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 7.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 7.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.3, housing court bias 5, rent-control risk 6.4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.3 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.3. Supply constraint: 9.3. The numbers behind those: 6.1% poverty, 5.0% unemployment, 61% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Wedderburn sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Portland, OR · 149d · ~$11.8k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.1 Portland Eugene, OR · 127d · ~$13.3k all-in ($104/day) · score 7.9 Eugene Salem, OR · 144d · ~$11.8k all-in ($82/day) · score 7.3 Salem Gresham, OR · 135d · ~$12.6k all-in ($94/day) · score 7.4 Gresham Hillsboro, OR · 133d · ~$11.2k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.9 Hillsboro Bend, OR · 129d · ~$13.2k all-in ($102/day) · score 6.5 Bend Beaverton, OR · 144d · ~$12.8k all-in ($89/day) · score 7 Beaverton Medford, OR · 129d · ~$12.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.6 Medford Springfield, OR · 139d · ~$12.4k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.9 Springfield Corvallis, OR · 143d · ~$12.2k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.4 Corvallis Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Wedderburn
Wedderburn · 151d · ~$11.9k all-in ($79/day) · score 5.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Wedderburn, OR

Landlording in Wedderburn, Oregon, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.8/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Wedderburn is a city of 206 residents where 16.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 61.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,056/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Wedderburn eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Wedderburn closes 151 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Wedderburn's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Wedderburn runs $6,292 to $17,553 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 151 days of typical timeline and $1,056/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.3/10 in Wedderburn, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Oregon, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Wedderburn: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Oregon's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $17,553 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Wedderburn

Trap · ORS 90 + SB 608
At 5.2/10, use documented notices and proactive screening. State default under ORS 90 + SB 608.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is "just cause" in Oregon?

After a tenant has lived in your Wedderburn property for one year, you generally cannot evict them without a "just cause." This means you need a specific, legally defined reason, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or landlord-use reasons (like moving in a family member or selling to an owner-occupant). You can't just decide you want the tenant out.

Q2

Can I raise the rent whenever I want in Wedderburn?

No. Oregon has statewide rent control. You can only raise the rent once per 12-month period, and the increase is capped at 7% plus the consumer price index (CPI). This means you need to calculate the allowable increase carefully each year. Always give proper written notice (usually 90 days) for any rent increase.

Q3

What if my tenant claims their source of income is protected?

Oregon law provides statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a housing voucher, Social Security, or other legal forms of income. You must consider their application based on your standard screening criteria, as long as their income meets your requirements. Treat all legal income sources equally.

Q4

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Oregon?

You have 31 days from the date the tenancy ends and the tenant vacates the property to either return the full security deposit or provide an itemized written statement explaining any deductions. Failure to meet this deadline can result in you owing the tenant double the amount of the deposit wrongfully withheld.

Q5

What's the biggest mistake landlords make in Wedderburn evictions?

The biggest mistake is often procedural error, either using the wrong notice, not serving it correctly, or missing a deadline. Oregon's tenant laws are very specific. One small mistake can get your entire eviction case dismissed, forcing you to start over, which means more lost rent and attorney fees. Always double-check your notices and timelines, or better yet, consult a legal professional.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 5.8/10 places Wedderburn in the 16th percentile of Oregon cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.