Skip to content
Terrebonne, Oregon eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,602 residents

Terrebonne, OR Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Deschutes County · Population 1,602

In 2026
Risk score
6.6
ELEVATED

67th percentile, Oregon.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.4 Average4.1 Now6.6
7.2 2.4 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.5 1978 · score 2.4 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.7 1982 · score 2.7 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 3.1 1993 · score 3.1 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.1 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.2 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.6 2001 · score 3.8 2002 · score 3.9 2003 · score 4.0 2004 · score 4.1 2005 · score 4.1 2006 · score 4.1 2007 · score 4.2 2008 · score 4.8 2009 · score 5.1 2010 · score 5.2 2011 · score 5.2 2012 · score 5.1 2013 · score 5.0 2014 · score 5.3 2015 · score 5.3 2016 · score 5.3 2017 · score 5.2 2018 · score 5.2 2019 · score 6.1 2020 · score 7.2 2021 · score 7.0 2022 · score 6.8 2023 · score 6.5 2024 · score 6.8 2025 · score 6.7 2026 · score 6.6

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.4 Regional 4.4 State 7.2 Economic 7.3 Supply 2.3 Rent Control 5.7 Eviction 6.4 Tenant 2.3 Housing 4.6 6.6 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +10.1% (2024)
    4.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.4
  3. State political climate
    Oregon legislature & governorship
    7.2
  4. Economic stress
    8.7% poverty · 33.2% unemp.
    7.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,275 average · 2.6% renters
    2.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.8% of income on rent
    5.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    143 days filing → judgment
    6.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    2.6% renters
    2.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.6
Geographic context

Risk heat across Terrebonne and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Terrebonne compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Deschutes County
Moderate
#8 of 16 cities
Rank in county, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 16 cities in Deschutes County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Oregon
Elevated
#172 of 425 cities
Rank in state, 60th percentileLowHigh
#172 of 425 cities in Oregon for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Terrebonne risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Terrebonne: 6.66.6TerrebonneThis cityCounty: 6.56.5Countyavg in countyState: 7.17.1Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.6
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 143d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,275/mo. A contested eviction takes 143 days and costs $7,095–$17,098 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 2.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,602 residents, 2.6% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.4 and 4.4 (Dem margin +10.1% (2024)). State climate at 7.2, a tenant-leaning legislature.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 7.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 7.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.4, housing court bias 4.6, rent-control risk 5.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.3. Supply constraint: 2.3. The numbers behind those: 8.7% poverty, 33.2% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Terrebonne sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Bend, OR · 129d · ~$13.2k all-in ($102/day) · score 6.5 Bend Portland, OR · 149d · ~$11.8k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.1 Portland Eugene, OR · 127d · ~$13.3k all-in ($104/day) · score 7.9 Eugene Salem, OR · 144d · ~$11.8k all-in ($82/day) · score 7.3 Salem Gresham, OR · 135d · ~$12.6k all-in ($94/day) · score 7.4 Gresham Hillsboro, OR · 133d · ~$11.2k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.9 Hillsboro Beaverton, OR · 144d · ~$12.8k all-in ($89/day) · score 7 Beaverton Medford, OR · 129d · ~$12.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.6 Medford Springfield, OR · 139d · ~$12.4k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.9 Springfield Corvallis, OR · 143d · ~$12.2k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.4 Corvallis Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Terrebonne
Terrebonne · 143d · ~$12.1k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Terrebonne, OR

Landlording in Terrebonne, Oregon, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.6/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Terrebonne is a city of 1,602 residents where 2.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,275/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Terrebonne eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Terrebonne closes 143 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Terrebonne's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Terrebonne runs $7,095 to $17,098 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 143 days of typical timeline and $1,275/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.3/10 in Terrebonne, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Oregon, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Terrebonne: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Oregon's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $17,098 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Terrebonne

Trap · ORS 90 + SB 608
At 5.4/10, use documented notices and proactive screening. State default under ORS 90 + SB 608.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Terrebonne tenant pays rent late, but always within the 10-day notice period?

If they consistently pay within the 10-day pay-or-quit period, you cannot evict them for non-payment. They are complying with the notice. However, you can charge late fees as outlined in your lease. If the late payments become a nuisance, you might consider not renewing their lease, but remember the statewide just-cause requirement means you'd need a valid reason for non-renewal after the first year, or a 90-day notice if applicable.

Q2

Can I refuse to rent to someone in Terrebonne if they use a housing voucher?

No. Oregon has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot discriminate against applicants based on their lawful source of income, including housing vouchers. You must treat them the same as any other applicant, applying your standard screening criteria (credit, background, references) equally.

Q3

What's the biggest mistake a new landlord in Terrebonne makes?

The biggest mistake is usually failing to serve proper notices or accepting partial rent payments without a clear written agreement. Both can completely derail an eviction case, costing you months and thousands of dollars. Always use the correct legal forms for notices and be extremely cautious with partial payments.

Q4

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Oregon?

You have 31 days from the date the tenancy ends and the tenant vacates the property to return the security deposit or provide an itemized list of deductions. Miss this deadline, and you could be liable for double the amount wrongfully withheld.

Q5

Should I always hire an attorney for an eviction in Terrebonne?

For non-payment or other lease violations that require a court filing, absolutely. While it's an added cost, the complexity of Oregon's landlord-tenant laws, the just-cause requirement, and the potential for costly delays make legal counsel almost essential. An attorney can save you significant time and money by ensuring the process is handled correctly from the start. See our Jefferson County eviction guide for more local context.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.6/10 places Terrebonne in the 67th percentile of Oregon cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.