1 census tracts · pop 3,017 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 6.5/10
· range 6.5–6.5
Stadium District is a one-tract neighborhood of Lancaster, PA and houses 3,017 people. Scored across those inputs it reaches 6.5/10, placing it in the Elevated tier. Cost burden runs 49% against 28.9% citywide, putting Stadium District 20.5% over its own city.
Severe burden reaches 32%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears. At $1,713 a month, rents sit 38% over what the rest of Lancaster commands.
The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10. The voucher gap is 23.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears.
The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest. On the high side is supply constraint at 7.3/10. The filing record is not thin: 222 evictions logged in this tract.
The worst year on record was 2000, when filings touched 12.9% of renter households. Recent filings have not receded much: 12.0% in 2006 against a 12.9% peak. Among the 17 mapped neighborhoods of Lancaster, it ranks #8 by risk, the middle third.
The closest comparables inside the same city are Cabbage Hill and West End. Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $74,615. 58% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Because the boundary contains one tract, 6.5/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
6.5
Elevated
1 tracts · population-weighted
Stadium District vs LancasterHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority48%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport79%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab
Court-record eviction history in Stadium District
Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
222Total filings (sum)
10.89%Avg annual filing rate
12.9%Peak year (2000)
11.99%Latest filed (2006)
Frequently asked
About Stadium District
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Stadium District?
Stadium District scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Stadium District compare to Lancaster overall?
Stadium District scores 1.3 points higher than Lancaster overall (5.2/10). Renters spend 49% of income on rent vs 29% citywide. Average rent: $1,713 vs $1,240.
Q3
What is the average rent in Stadium District?
Average gross rent in Stadium District is $1,713/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Stadium District residents are renters?
58% of Stadium District households are renter-occupied (vs 51% in Lancaster). The neighborhood has 3,017 residents.
Q5
Is Stadium District a high social-vulnerability area?
Stadium District sits in the 58th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
How safe is Stadium District for landlords?
Stadium District carries a elevated-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (6.5/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Lancaster as a whole (5.2/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7
What is the demographic breakdown of Stadium District?
Stadium District has 3,142 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (62.1%), Hispanic / Latino (18.9%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (10.3%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.