Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Fourth Avenue Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Birmingham

Tract 01073002701 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 1,151 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 01073002701 covers part of the Fourth Avenue Historic District area of Birmingham, AL, and scores 3.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,151 residents. The severe-burden share is 38%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 25% Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units983
Renter share50.1%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$62,829

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Fourth Avenue Historic District
Very Low
Within parent city
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#65 of 71 tracts In Birmingham
Very Low
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#110 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Moderate
Within state
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#714 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Birmingham and the region

Centroid at 33.5145, -86.8089 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fourth Avenue Historic District scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,911 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0

How Fourth Avenue Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fourth Avenue Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.7This tracttract 0027014.0Birminghamparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 20

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fourth Avenue Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fourth Avenue Historic District

The dominant input is supply constraint at 10/10. At $1,911 a month, rents run 73% over what the rest of Birmingham commands.

The voucher gap is 50.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Annualized rent equals 36% of average household income of $62,829, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10. SNAP participation runs 5.7% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 9.6% against 17.8% nationally.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Birmingham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 35th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073002701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073002701?

Census tract 01073002701 in the Fourth Avenue Historic District neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073002701?

Median gross rent is $1,911/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073002701?

9.4% of residents in tract 01073002701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,151.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073002701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 1th, minority 42th, housing 74th.
Q5

Is tract 01073002701 considered part of Fourth Avenue Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073002701 fall within Fourth Avenue Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 01073002701 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01073002701 compare to Birmingham overall?

Tract 01073002701 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 01073002701 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 9% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham

Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related