Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Arapaho Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Surprise

Tract 04013061028 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 2,866 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

04013061028 is a census tract in the Arapaho Village area of Surprise, AZ. It scores 3.7/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,866. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 29% Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,212
Renter share62.7%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate13.0%
Median income$74,438

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Arapaho Village
Moderate
Within parent city
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 29 tracts In Surprise
High
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#411 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Elevated
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#756 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Surprise and the region

Centroid at 33.6345, -112.3676 · click any tract to drill in

Why Arapaho Village scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Surprise
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
13.0% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,794 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Surprise
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Surprise
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Surprise
2.0

How Arapaho Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Arapaho Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 061028Surprise: 3.23.2Surpriseparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 136Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 808.92%Avg annual filing rate
  • 124.3%Peak (2005)
  • 77Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040130610282001: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 14 filings (546.34/100 renter HHs)2004: 45 filings (1,756.10/100 renter HHs)2005: 77 filings (124.32/100 renter HHs)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Arapaho Village

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the softer side, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10.

Against Maricopa County at 46.0%, 54% of renters here are cost-burdened. Court records carry 136 eviction filings across 3 observed years. At $1,794 a month, rents run 12% under what the rest of Surprise commands.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 124.3% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 808.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 35th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

It tracks the Maricopa County average of 3.7 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013061028

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013061028?

Census tract 04013061028 in the Arapaho Village neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013061028?

Median gross rent is $1,794/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013061028?

13.0% of residents in tract 04013061028 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,866.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013061028?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 84th, minority 30th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 04013061028 considered part of Arapaho Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013061028 fall within Arapaho Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013061028?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 136 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 04013061028 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 808.92% of renter households, peaking at 124.3% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013061028 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013061028 compare to Surprise overall?

Tract 04013061028 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Surprise at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Surprise eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Surprise

Top eight tracts in Surprise ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related