Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Stonefield Eviction Risk: Lower , Chandler

Tract 04013811800 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 1,766 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 04013811800 covers part of the Stonefield area of Chandler, AZ, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,766 residents. Severe burden reaches 59%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 2% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units576
Renter share7.1%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate0.0%
Median income$185,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Stonefield
Moderate
Within parent city
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 61 tracts In Chandler
Low
Within county
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#940 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Very Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chandler and the region

Centroid at 33.2831, -111.8855 · click any tract to drill in

Why Stonefield scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chandler
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
0.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,927 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chandler
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chandler
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chandler
2.0

How Stonefield compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Stonefield risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 811800Chandler: 3.23.2Chandlerparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 196Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 198.86%Avg annual filing rate
  • 536.5%Peak (2004)
  • 39Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040138118002001: 1 filings (6.17/100 renter HHs)2002: 12 filings (73.99/100 renter HHs)2003: 57 filings (351.47/100 renter HHs)2004: 87 filings (536.45/100 renter HHs)2005: 39 filings (26.23/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 3,800% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Stonefield

Against Maricopa County at 46.0%, 73% of renters here are cost-burdened. What pushes it up most is supply constraint at 10/10. At $2,927 a month, rents run 54% over what the rest of Chandler commands.

The voucher gap is 50.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10.

Disability prevalence runs 17.8% against 31.5% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 5.3% against 14.2% nationally.

Court records carry 196 eviction filings across 5 observed years. It sits 0.7 points below the Maricopa County average of 3.7.

The worst year on record was 2004, when 536.5% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 198.9% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 7% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013811800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013811800?

Census tract 04013811800 in the Stonefield neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013811800?

Median gross rent is $2,927/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013811800?

0.0% of residents in tract 04013811800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,766.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013811800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 44th, minority 56th, housing 28th.
Q5

Is tract 04013811800 considered part of Stonefield?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013811800 fall within Stonefield (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013811800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 196 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013811800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 198.86% of renter households, peaking at 536.5% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013811800 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013811800 compare to Chandler overall?

Tract 04013811800 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Chandler at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chandler eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chandler

Top eight tracts in Chandler ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related