Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Chandler Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 04013523102 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 5,973

Census tract 04013523102 runs through Chandler. With 5,973 residents, it scores $1/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 40% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 38% of renter households, a high level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,685 a month while the average household earns $80,019 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 62% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 38% Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units2,063
Renter share62.3%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate22.6%
Median income$80,019

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 61 tracts In Chandler
Very High
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#401 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Elevated
Within state
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#859 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Moderate
National
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chandler and the region

Centroid at 33.2989, -111.8329 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chandler scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chandler
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
22.6% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$1,685 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chandler
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chandler
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chandler
2.0

How Chandler compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chandler risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 523102Chandler: 2.52.5Chandlerparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 760Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 20.68%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.4%Peak (2005)
  • 183Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040135231022001: 148 filings (21.29/100 renter HHs)2002: 147 filings (21.15/100 renter HHs)2003: 127 filings (18.27/100 renter HHs)2004: 155 filings (22.30/100 renter HHs)2005: 183 filings (20.40/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 24% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chandler

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 5.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chandler eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Maricopa County average of 5.1 and in line with the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 760 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 20.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 20.4% of renter households in 2005.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 82nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013523102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013523102?

Census tract 04013523102 in Chandler scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013523102?

Median gross rent is $1,685/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013523102?

22.6% of residents in tract 04013523102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,973.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013523102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 73th, minority 77th, housing 82th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013523102?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 760 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013523102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.68% of renter households, peaking at 20.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 04013523102 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 04013523102 compare to Chandler overall?

Tract 04013523102 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Chandler at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chandler eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chandler

Top eight tracts in Chandler ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related