Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Sendera Place Eviction Risk: Lower , Chandler

Tract 04013813300 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 6,096 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Tract 04013813300 covers Sendera Place in Chandler in Arizona. Home to 6,096 residents, it scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

77% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,224 a month while the average household earns $167,500 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 3% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 1% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units2,034
Renter share3.0%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$167,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sendera Place
Moderate
Within parent city
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 61 tracts In Chandler
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#981 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#1,712 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chandler and the region

Centroid at 33.2412, -111.7895 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sendera Place scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chandler
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$3,224 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chandler
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chandler
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chandler
2.0

How Sendera Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sendera Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 813300Chandler: 2.52.5Chandlerparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 1.12%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.1%Peak (2005)
  • 2Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040138133002001: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2004: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2005: 2 filings (1.12/100 renter HHs)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sendera Place

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chandler eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Maricopa County average of 5.1 and in line with the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 1.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.1% of renter households in 2005.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013813300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013813300?

Census tract 04013813300 in the Sendera Place neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013813300?

Median gross rent is $3,224/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 77% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013813300?

4.2% of residents in tract 04013813300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,096.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013813300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 13th, minority 49th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 04013813300 considered part of Sendera Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013813300 fall within Sendera Place (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013813300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 04013813300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.12% of renter households, peaking at 1.1% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013813300 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013813300 compare to Chandler overall?

Tract 04013813300 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Chandler at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chandler eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chandler

Top eight tracts in Chandler ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related