Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally

Fortuna Foothills Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 04027011123 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,249 · 90% of tract blocks fall in Fortuna Foothills

Tract 04027011123 covers Fortuna Foothills in Arizona. Home to 1,249 residents, it scores 5.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 56% of renter households, a severe level, and 56% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $686 monthly, set against $52,042 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 14% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 6% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units685
Renter share14.3%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate17.9%
Median income$52,042

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 13 tracts In Fortuna Foothills
High
Within county
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#46 of 67 tracts In Yuma
Low
Within state
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#618 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Elevated
National
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#37,643 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.6388, -114.4523 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fortuna Foothills scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
17.9% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$686 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
7.0

How Fortuna Foothills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fortuna Foothills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 011123Fortuna Foothills: 3.03.0Fortuna Foothillsparent cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fortuna Foothills

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Yuma County average of 4.3 and in line with the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 81st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 04027011123

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027011123?

Census tract 04027011123 in Fortuna Foothills scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04027011123?

Median gross rent is $686/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04027011123?

17.9% of residents in tract 04027011123 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,249.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04027011123?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 72th, minority 50th, housing 59th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 04027011123 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 04027011123 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?

Tract 04027011123 scores 4.2/10, higher than the parent city of Fortuna Foothills at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills

Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related