Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,919 of 84,120 nationally

College Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Claremont

Tract 06037402002 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,180 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 06037402002 covers part of the College Park area of Claremont, CA, and scores 7/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 38%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 12% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,566
Renter share43.8%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$84,940

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In College Park
Very High
Within parent city
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 9 tracts In Claremont
High
Within county
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#1,924 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#5,249 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Claremont and the region

Centroid at 34.0874, -117.7135 · click any tract to drill in

Why College Park scores 7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claremont
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,783 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claremont
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claremont
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claremont
5.9

How College Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
College Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.07.0This tracttract 402002Claremont: 7.47.4Claremontparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within College Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in College Park

Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 72% of renters here are cost-burdened. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.8/10.

On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.2/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.4 points.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.2/10. At $1,783 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Claremont commands.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 85% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 7.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $84,940. 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037402002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037402002?

Census tract 06037402002 in the College Park neighborhood scores 7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037402002?

Median gross rent is $1,783/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037402002?

8.8% of residents in tract 06037402002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,180.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037402002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 45th, minority 64th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 06037402002 considered part of College Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037402002 fall within College Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037402002 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037402002 compare to Claremont overall?

Tract 06037402002 scores 7/10, lower than the parent city of Claremont at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claremont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037402002 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claremont

Top eight tracts in Claremont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related