Within neighborhood
67
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally
Concord Place Eviction Risk: Elevated , Fountain Valley
Tract 06059099233 · Orange, CA · pop 3,206 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
With a score of 6.4/10, tract 06059099233 in the Concord Place area of Fountain Valley, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs roughly two in three here against 51.8% across Orange County.
Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units955
Renter share19.4%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$122,168
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
36
th percentile
Low
Within county
39
th percentile
Low
Within state
30
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fountain Valley and the region
Centroid at 33.7085, -117.9761 · click any tract to drill in
Why Concord Place scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fountain Valley
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$3,500 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fountain Valley
8.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fountain Valley
7.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fountain Valley
6.5
How Concord Place compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 53%Socioeconomic
- 66%Household composition
- 77%Racial/ethnic minority
- 55%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Concord Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.4%Food insecurity
- 10.3%SNAP enrollment
- 6.9%Transit barriers
- 6.6%No health insurance
- 15.8%Frequent mental distress
- 28.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Concord Place
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.9/10. Average gross rent is $3,500, 33% above the Fountain Valley average. Set annual rent against average income of $122,168 and the ratio lands at 34%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2/10. The voucher gap is 20.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.2/10. That is riskier than roughly 81% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 19% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 6.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler. It tracks the Orange County average of 7.0 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06059099233
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059099233?
Census tract 06059099233 in the Concord Place neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06059099233?
Median gross rent is $3,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06059099233?
8.1% of residents in tract 06059099233 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,206.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06059099233?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 53th, household 66th, minority 77th, housing 55th.
Q5
Is tract 06059099233 considered part of Concord Place?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059099233 fall within Concord Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06059099233 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06059099233 compare to Fountain Valley overall?
Tract 06059099233 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Fountain Valley at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fountain Valley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fountain Valley
Top eight tracts in Fountain Valley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
North Island
7.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Concord Place
7.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Fountain Plaza
7.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Tiburon
6.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06059099224
6.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
North Island
6.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Concord Place
6.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Concord Place
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Related