Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,308 of 84,120 nationally
McKinley Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento
Tract 06067000100 · Sacramento, CA · pop 4,051 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
With a score of 6.7/10, tract 06067000100 in the McKinley Village area of Sacramento, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,051 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.5/10.
Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,776
Renter share30.7%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate7.9%
Median income$116,974
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
15
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
41
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
37
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Sacramento and the region
Centroid at 38.5778, -121.4326 · click any tract to drill in
Why McKinley Village scores 6.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.9% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$2,050 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
How McKinley Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 17
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 22%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within McKinley Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.7%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.4%Transit barriers
- 4.3%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 26.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in McKinley Village
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 8/10.
Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 7.7% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $2,050, 15% above the Sacramento average.
Adults with no health insurance runs 4.3% against 11.3% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 83rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.5/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for about half of renters. It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067000100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067000100?
Census tract 06067000100 in the McKinley Village neighborhood scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067000100?
Median gross rent is $2,050/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067000100?
7.9% of residents in tract 06067000100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,051.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067000100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 19th, minority 43th, housing 22th.
Q5
Is tract 06067000100 considered part of McKinley Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067000100 fall within McKinley Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067000100 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067000100 compare to Sacramento overall?
Tract 06067000100 scores 6.7/10, lower than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento
Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Ben Ali
9.3
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Valley Hi / North Laguna
9.3
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Elder Creek
9.3
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Valley Hi / North Laguna
9.3
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Fairgrounds
9.3
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
06067006501
9.3
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Parkway
9.3
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Lawrence Park
9.3
/ 10 · Very High
Related