Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #13,349 of 84,120 nationally

Foster City Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06081608013 · San Mateo, CA · pop 3,677

06081608013 is a census tract in Foster City, CA. It scores 6.9/10 for landlords. Against San Mateo County at 44.9%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 17% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,379
Renter share46.0%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$164,141

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 9 tracts In Foster City
High
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#87 of 173 tracts In San Mateo
Moderate
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#5,398 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#13,349 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Foster City and the region

Centroid at 37.5409, -122.2619 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foster City scores 6.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foster City
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foster City
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foster City
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foster City
5.1

How Foster City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Foster City risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.9This tracttract 6080137.0Foster Cityparent city7.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 38

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foster City

Severe burden reaches 30%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The clearest offset is court filing pressure at 1.4/10.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.8/10. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.1/10.

Food insecurity runs 8.4% against 17.8% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the national scale it lands near the 84th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Social vulnerability reads 4.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

It tracks the San Mateo County average of 7.0 closely. Average gross rent is $3,501, close to the Foster City average.

Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $164,141. 46% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06081608013

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081608013?

Census tract 06081608013 in Foster City scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06081608013?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06081608013?

7.1% of residents in tract 06081608013 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,677.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06081608013?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 18th, minority 79th, housing 75th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06081608013 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06081608013 compare to Foster City overall?

Tract 06081608013 scores 6.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Foster City at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foster City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Foster City

Top eight tracts in Foster City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related