Foster City Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06081608013 · San Mateo, CA · pop 3,677
Census tract 06081608013 runs through Foster City. With 3,677 residents, it scores 5.4/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 55% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
62% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,501 monthly, set against $164,141 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 46% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Foster City and the region
Centroid at 37.5409, -122.2619 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foster City scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Foster City compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 38
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 18%Household composition
- 79%Racial/ethnic minority
- 75%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.4%Food insecurity
- 5.7%SNAP enrollment
- 4.7%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 11.8%Frequent mental distress
- 18.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Foster City
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foster City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the San Mateo County average of 5.1 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is Asian and White and ranks around the 38th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 06081608013
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081608013?
What is the average rent in tract 06081608013?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06081608013?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06081608013?
What share of households in tract 06081608013 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06081608013 compare to Foster City overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Foster City
Top eight tracts in Foster City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.