Census Tract · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
Brighton Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 08001008565 ·
Adams County, CO · pop 7,506 · 89% of tract blocks fall in Brighton
With a score of 4.9/10, tract 08001008565 in Brighton, CO reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 7,506 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.9/10.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%Stable renters 11%Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units2,185
Renter share23.3%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate7.5%
Median income$71,847
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
67th percentile
#4 of 10 tracts In Brighton
Elevated
Within county
64th percentile
#39 of 107 tracts In Adams County
Elevated
Within state
53th percentile
#683 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Moderate
National
59th percentile
#34,278 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Brighton and the region
Centroid at 39.9791, -104.7870 · click any tract to drill in
Why Brighton scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brighton
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
7.5% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,791 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brighton
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brighton
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brighton
6.0
How Brighton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 85
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.3/10. Severe burden reaches 19%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.9/10.
That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 23% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 8.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. 54% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
It tracks the Adams County average of 4.5 closely. Average gross rent is $1,791, close to the Brighton average. Annual rent works out to 30% of average household income of $71,847.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 08001008565
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08001008565?
Census tract 08001008565 in Brighton scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 08001008565?
Median gross rent is $1,791/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 08001008565?
7.5% of residents in tract 08001008565 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,506.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 08001008565?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 74th, minority 68th, housing 85th.
Q5
How does tract 08001008565 compare to Brighton overall?
Tract 08001008565 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Brighton at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brighton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Brighton
Top eight tracts in Brighton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.