Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Central Oak Park Eviction Risk: Lower , St. Petersburg

Tract 12103022101 · Pinellas, FL · pop 1,946 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 12103022101, home to 1,946 residents in the Central Oak Park neighborhood of St. Petersburg, scores $1/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 12th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 25% of renter households, a moderate level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,187 a month against an average household income of $61,917 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 37% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 27% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units893
Renter share36.5%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate16.7%
Median income$61,917

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Central Oak Park
Very High
Within parent city
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 77 tracts In St. Petersburg
Elevated
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#79 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Elevated
Within state
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#1,782 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Petersburg and the region

Centroid at 27.7787, -82.6897 · click any tract to drill in

Why Central Oak Park scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Petersburg
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
16.7% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$1,187 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Petersburg
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Petersburg
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Petersburg
4.0

How Central Oak Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Central Oak Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 022101St. Petersburg: 2.72.7St. Petersburgparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 43

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 74Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.40×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Central Oak Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Central Oak Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 4.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Petersburg eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Pinellas County average of 4.8 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Part of this tract, about 31% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.40x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103022101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103022101?

Census tract 12103022101 in the Central Oak Park neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103022101?

Median gross rent is $1,187/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 25% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103022101?

16.7% of residents in tract 12103022101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,946.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103022101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 11th, minority 31th, housing 48th.
Q5

Is tract 12103022101 considered part of Central Oak Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103022101 fall within Central Oak Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12103022101 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.40× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12103022101 compare to St. Petersburg overall?

Tract 12103022101 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of St. Petersburg at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Petersburg eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 12103022101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 31% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Petersburg

Top eight tracts in St. Petersburg ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related