Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,661 of 84,120 nationally

Kings Manor Eviction Risk: Lower , Largo

Tract 12103025411 · Pinellas, FL · pop 1,978 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

How risky is Kings Manor in Largo for landlords? Census tract 12103025411 scores 5.5/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #35,486 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 62% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,669 a month while the average household earns $80,484 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 46% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 18% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units684
Renter share46.3%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate13.5%
Median income$80,484

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Kings Manor
Low
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#21 of 31 tracts In Largo
Low
Within county
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#135 of 273 tracts In Pinellas
Moderate
Within state
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#2,249 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Largo and the region

Centroid at 27.8964, -82.7561 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kings Manor scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Largo
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
13.5% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,669 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Largo
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Largo
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Largo
6.9

How Kings Manor compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kings Manor risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 025411Largo: 2.42.4Largoparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 58

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 485Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 9.42%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.5%Peak (2003)
  • 16Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 121030254112000: 25 filings (8.63/100 renter HHs)2001: 27 filings (9.33/100 renter HHs)2002: 25 filings (8.63/100 renter HHs)2003: 45 filings (15.54/100 renter HHs)2004: 26 filings (8.98/100 renter HHs)2005: 30 filings (13.07/100 renter HHs)2006: 40 filings (17.42/100 renter HHs)2007: 29 filings (12.63/100 renter HHs)2008: 32 filings (13.94/100 renter HHs)2009: 15 filings (6.53/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (6.92/100 renter HHs)2011: 28 filings (7.98/100 renter HHs)2012: 23 filings (6.55/100 renter HHs)2013: 40 filings (11.40/100 renter HHs)2014: 21 filings (5.98/100 renter HHs)2015: 15 filings (4.27/100 renter HHs)2016: 26 filings (7.30/100 renter HHs)2017: 16 filings (4.49/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 36% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 65Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.54×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kings Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kings Manor

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Largo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pinellas County average of 4.8 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.54x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 58th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12103025411

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12103025411?

Census tract 12103025411 in the Kings Manor neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12103025411?

Median gross rent is $1,669/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12103025411?

13.5% of residents in tract 12103025411 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,978.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12103025411?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 21th, minority 64th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 12103025411 considered part of Kings Manor?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12103025411 fall within Kings Manor (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12103025411?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 485 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 12103025411 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.42% of renter households, peaking at 15.5% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12103025411 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.54× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12103025411 compare to Largo overall?

Tract 12103025411 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Largo at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Largo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Largo

Top eight tracts in Largo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related