Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally

River Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Mishawaka

Tract 18141010201 · St. Joseph County, IN · pop 3,767 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

The River Park area of Mishawaka is where census tract 18141010201 sits, home to 3,767 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is $1/10. On the national scale it ranks #20,949 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 32% of renter households, a high level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,088 a month while the average household earns $43,951 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 24% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 16% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,484
Renter share23.5%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate26.6%
Median income$43,951

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In River Park
High
Within parent city
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 15 tracts In Mishawaka
High
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 82 tracts In St. Joseph County
High
Within state
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#217 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mishawaka and the region

Centroid at 41.6526, -86.1857 · click any tract to drill in

Why River Park scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mishawaka
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
26.6% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$1,088 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mishawaka
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mishawaka
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mishawaka
6.8

How River Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
River Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 010201Mishawaka: 2.72.7Mishawakaparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 210Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.72×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-03-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 8 filings (1.28× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-07-01: 9 filings (1.44× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Richmond, VA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within River Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in River Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mishawaka eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the St. Joseph County average of 5.2 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Part of this tract, about 10% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.72x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 18141010201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18141010201?

Census tract 18141010201 in the River Park neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18141010201?

Median gross rent is $1,088/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18141010201?

26.6% of residents in tract 18141010201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,767.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18141010201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 52th, minority 22th, housing 9th.
Q5

Is tract 18141010201 considered part of River Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18141010201 fall within River Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18141010201 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.72× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Richmond eviction risk, VA), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18141010201 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18141010201 compare to Mishawaka overall?

Tract 18141010201 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Mishawaka at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mishawaka eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18141010201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 10% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mishawaka

Top eight tracts in Mishawaka ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related