Neighborhood · Ranked #14,308 of 84,120 nationally

Frederick Douglass Square Historic District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Boston

Tract 25025010701 · Suffolk County, MA · pop 2,314 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 6.7/10, tract 25025010701 in the Frederick Douglass Square Historic District area of Boston, MA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,314. Cost burden runs 34% here against 47.0% across Suffolk County.

Risk score

6.7

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 49% Owners 25%

Tract context

Occupied units1,290

Renter share75.1%

SVI overall0.06

Poverty rate9.7%

Median income$143,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Boston and the region

Centroid at 42.3497, -71.0839 · click any tract to drill in

Why Frederick Douglass Square Historic District scores 6.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Boston

8.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

8.2

State political climate

Massachusetts legislature & governorship

6.2

Economic stress

9.7% poverty · this tract

2.4

Supply constraint

$2,598 rent vs county FMR

4.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from Boston

8.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

8.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Boston

8.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Boston

8.0

How Frederick Douglass Square Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

3%Socioeconomic
0%Household composition
41%Racial/ethnic minority
74%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
74%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.¹

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

27Total filings over 5 yrs
0.55%Avg annual filing rate
0.8%Peak (2015)
6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Filings by year 2012 to 2016

Filings climbed 20% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

7Total filings 2020-21
0.2Avg monthly (observed)
0.5Pre-pandemic baseline
0.33×Ratio to baseline

Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2023-11-01

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Frederick Douglass Square Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

7.2%Housing insecurity
4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
6.6%Food insecurity
6.7%SNAP enrollment
5.6%Transit barriers
2.7%No health insurance
15.8%Frequent mental distress
17.4%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Frederick Douglass Square Historic District

What pushes it up most is local political climate at 8.5/10. This is renter territory: 75% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10. Disability prevalence runs 17.4% against 31.5% nationally. Running hot, regional political climate reads 8.2/10.

The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Average gross rent is $2,598, 21% above the Boston average.

Against the Suffolk County average of 7.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. SNAP participation runs 6.7% against 15.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 27 evictions over 5 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2015 at 0.8% of renter households.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 25025010701

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25025010701?

Census tract 25025010701 in the Frederick Douglass Square Historic District neighborhood scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 25025010701?

Median gross rent is $2,598/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 25025010701?

9.7% of residents in tract 25025010701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,314.

How socially vulnerable is tract 25025010701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 0th, minority 41th, housing 74th.

Is tract 25025010701 considered part of Frederick Douglass Square Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25025010701 fall within Frederick Douglass Square Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25025010701?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 27 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25025010701 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.55% of renter households, peaking at 0.8% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Did eviction filings in tract 25025010701 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.33× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Boston eviction risk, MA), 2020-2021.

What share of households in tract 25025010701 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 25025010701 compare to Boston overall?

Tract 25025010701 scores 6.7/10, lower than the parent city of Boston at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q10

Was tract 25025010701 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Boston

Top eight tracts in Boston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Eviction Lab tract-level court records (2000-2018) and Eviction Tracking System, Princeton University. Open Data Commons Attribution license. evictionlab.org