Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Worcester

Tract 25027730901 · Worcester County, MA · pop 3,857 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Eviction risk in Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District in Worcester centers on tract 25027730901, which scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,857 residents. That is riskier than about 78% of US census tracts.

38% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,649 a month while the average household earns $100,402 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 31% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 19% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,583
Renter share30.8%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$100,402

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#35 of 46 tracts In Worcester
Low
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#66 of 191 tracts In Worcester County
Elevated
Within state
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#539 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Worcester and the region

Centroid at 42.2703, -71.8354 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Worcester
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,649 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Worcester
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Worcester
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Worcester
7.0

How Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 730901Worcester: 6.46.4Worcesterparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 12Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 2.52%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.5%Peak (2015)
  • 12Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Worcester eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Worcester County average of 6.0 and in line with the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 53rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 25027730901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25027730901?

Census tract 25027730901 in the Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25027730901?

Median gross rent is $1,649/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25027730901?

9.8% of residents in tract 25027730901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,857.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25027730901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 72th, minority 30th, housing 75th.
Q5

Is tract 25027730901 considered part of Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25027730901 fall within Lincoln Estate-Elm Park Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25027730901?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 12 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 25027730901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.52% of renter households, peaking at 2.5% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 25027730901 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 25027730901 compare to Worcester overall?

Tract 25027730901 scores 4.2/10, lower than the parent city of Worcester at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Worcester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Worcester

Top eight tracts in Worcester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related