Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Burns Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Ann Arbor

Tract 26161400400 · Washtenaw County, MI · pop 3,422 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 26161400400 covers Burns Park in Ann Arbor, home to 3,422 residents. For landlords it grades 6.7/10, an elevated reading. It lands near the 90th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 80% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,543 a month against an average household income of $137,734 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 26% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 5% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,307
Renter share26.4%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate24.6%
Median income$137,734

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Burns Park
Very High
Within parent city
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#20 of 41 tracts In Ann Arbor
Moderate
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 107 tracts In Washtenaw County
Elevated
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#923 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ann Arbor and the region

Centroid at 42.2648, -83.7311 · click any tract to drill in

Why Burns Park scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ann Arbor
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
24.6% poverty · this tract
6.2
Supply constraint
$1,543 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ann Arbor
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ann Arbor
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ann Arbor
5.0

How Burns Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Burns Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 400400Ann Arbor: 3.63.6Ann Arborparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 12

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 0.73%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.7%Peak (2014)
  • 3Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Burns Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Burns Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Ann Arbor eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Washtenaw County average of 6.0 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 12th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26161400400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26161400400?

Census tract 26161400400 in the Burns Park neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26161400400?

Median gross rent is $1,543/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 80% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26161400400?

24.6% of residents in tract 26161400400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,422.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26161400400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 1th, minority 41th, housing 28th.
Q5

Is tract 26161400400 considered part of Burns Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26161400400 fall within Burns Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 26161400400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 26161400400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.73% of renter households, peaking at 0.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 26161400400 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 26161400400 compare to Ann Arbor overall?

Tract 26161400400 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Ann Arbor at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ann Arbor eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ann Arbor

Top eight tracts in Ann Arbor ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related