Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally
Camden Ridge Twins Eviction Risk: Lower , Chaska
Tract 27019090901 · Carver County, MN · pop 3,130 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Census tract 27019090901 covers part of the Camden Ridge Twins area of Chaska, MN, and scores 3.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,130. Cost burden runs 64% here against 38.4% across Carver County.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,142
Renter share2.5%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$123,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
40
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
39
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chaska and the region
Centroid at 44.8126, -93.5834 · click any tract to drill in
Why Camden Ridge Twins scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chaska
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.8
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chaska
4.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chaska
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chaska
3.9
How Camden Ridge Twins compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 26%Socioeconomic
- 46%Household composition
- 29%Racial/ethnic minority
- 41%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Camden Ridge Twins. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.9%Housing insecurity
- 4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.4%Food insecurity
- 5.9%SNAP enrollment
- 5.9%Transit barriers
- 6.7%No health insurance
- 13.9%Frequent mental distress
- 23.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Camden Ridge Twins
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 9.4% against 17.8% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 35th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 2% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.8/10. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Carver County average of 3.9 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 27019090901
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27019090901?
Census tract 27019090901 in the Camden Ridge Twins neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 27019090901?
3.9% of residents in tract 27019090901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,130.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 27019090901?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 46th, minority 29th, housing 41th.
Q4
Is tract 27019090901 considered part of Camden Ridge Twins?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27019090901 fall within Camden Ridge Twins (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 27019090901 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 27019090901 compare to Chaska overall?
Tract 27019090901 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Chaska at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chaska eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chaska
Top eight tracts in Chaska ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related