Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

Eastview Eviction Risk: Moderate , St. Paul

Tract 27123031801 · Ramsey County, MN · pop 6,248 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 27123031801 sits in the Eastview area of St. Paul, Minnesota eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.8/10. That is riskier than about 68% of US census tracts.

About 28% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,202 monthly, set against $81,146 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 34% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,937
Renter share47.3%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate9.7%
Median income$81,146

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Eastview
Very Low
Within parent city
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#59 of 85 tracts In St. Paul
Low
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#58 of 143 tracts In Ramsey County
Elevated
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#371 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Paul and the region

Centroid at 44.9694, -93.0264 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eastview scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Paul
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
9.7% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,202 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Paul
7.5

How Eastview compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Eastview risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 031801St. Paul: 6.66.6St. Paulparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 467Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 9.58%Avg annual filing rate
  • 17.5%Peak (2009)
  • 65Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271230318012009: 90 filings (17.47/100 renter HHs)2010: 81 filings (12.74/100 renter HHs)2011: 67 filings (8.34/100 renter HHs)2012: 59 filings (7.35/100 renter HHs)2013: 57 filings (7.10/100 renter HHs)2014: 48 filings (5.98/100 renter HHs)2015: 65 filings (8.09/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 28% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 263Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.89×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 6 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-02-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (1.26× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (1.37× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.84× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2023-01-01: 12 filings (2.29× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (1.28× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (1.37× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (1.26× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (1.10× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.96× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (1.68× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (1.10× baseline)2024-12-01: 8 filings (1.68× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (1.52× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (1.28× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-06-01: 10 filings (1.95× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (2.10× baseline)2025-09-01: 7 filings (2.15× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.56× baseline)2025-11-01: 6 filings (1.66× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Eastview. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eastview

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ramsey County average of 6.0 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 91st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27123031801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27123031801?

Census tract 27123031801 in the Eastview neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27123031801?

Median gross rent is $1,202/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27123031801?

9.7% of residents in tract 27123031801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,248.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27123031801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 80th, minority 80th, housing 96th.
Q5

Is tract 27123031801 considered part of Eastview?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27123031801 fall within Eastview (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27123031801?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 467 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 27123031801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.58% of renter households, peaking at 17.5% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27123031801 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.89× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27123031801 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27123031801 compare to St. Paul overall?

Tract 27123031801 scores 4.7/10, lower than the parent city of St. Paul at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27123031801 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Paul

Top eight tracts in St. Paul ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related