Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Eastview Eviction Risk: Moderate , St. Paul

Tract 27123034701 · Ramsey County, MN · pop 3,827 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 27123034701 runs through the Eastview neighborhood of St. Paul. With 3,827 residents, it scores 6.3/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 83% of US census tracts.

About 53% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 37% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,287 a month while the average household earns $67,438 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 54% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 25% Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,748
Renter share53.6%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$67,438

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Eastview
Very Low
Within parent city
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#65 of 85 tracts In St. Paul
Low
Within county
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#63 of 143 tracts In Ramsey County
Elevated
Within state
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#404 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Paul and the region

Centroid at 44.9550, -93.0243 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eastview scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Paul
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,287 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Paul
7.5

How Eastview compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Eastview risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 034701St. Paul: 6.66.6St. Paulparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 308Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 4.80%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.5%Peak (2009)
  • 17Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271230347012009: 62 filings (7.52/100 renter HHs)2010: 49 filings (6.12/100 renter HHs)2011: 51 filings (5.16/100 renter HHs)2012: 44 filings (4.45/100 renter HHs)2013: 43 filings (4.35/100 renter HHs)2014: 42 filings (4.25/100 renter HHs)2015: 17 filings (1.72/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 73% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 216Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.45×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.35× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (1.04× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 12 filings (8.70× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-08-01: 7 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-09-01: 8 filings (4.94× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.45× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-12-01: 10 filings (3.47× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (5.33× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (1.42× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (1.91× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (2.55× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (2.47× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (2.90× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (2.86× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (2.08× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (3.09× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (2.90× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (1.53× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (3.70× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (2.08× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (9.33× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (3.09× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (2.36× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.76× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (3.70× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (3.62× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.69× baseline)2026-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Eastview. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eastview

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ramsey County average of 6.0 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Asian and White and ranks around the 85th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.45x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 27123034701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27123034701?

Census tract 27123034701 in the Eastview neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27123034701?

Median gross rent is $1,287/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27123034701?

5.2% of residents in tract 27123034701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,827.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27123034701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 66th, minority 81th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 27123034701 considered part of Eastview?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27123034701 fall within Eastview (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27123034701?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 308 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 27123034701 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.80% of renter households, peaking at 7.5% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27123034701 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.45× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27123034701 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27123034701 compare to St. Paul overall?

Tract 27123034701 scores 4.6/10, lower than the parent city of St. Paul at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27123034701 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Paul

Top eight tracts in St. Paul ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related