Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally
North Hampton Eviction Risk: Moderate , St. Louis
Tract 29510114101 ·
St. Louis city, MO · pop 3,757 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 29510114101, home to 3,757 residents in the North Hampton neighborhood of St. Louis, scores 5.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 61% of US census tracts.
42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $818 a month while the average household earns $49,688 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 49% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%Stable renters 28%Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units2,439
Renter share49.3%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate15.7%
Median income$49,688
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In North Hampton
Very High
Within parent city
39th percentile
#64 of 104 tracts In St. Louis
Low
Within county
40th percentile
#63 of 104 tracts In St. Louis city
Low
Within state
70th percentile
#500 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across St. Louis and the region
Centroid at 38.5930, -90.2822 · click any tract to drill in
Why North Hampton scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Louis
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.3
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
15.7% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$818 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Louis
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Louis
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Louis
5.0
How North Hampton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
59%Socioeconomic
18%Household composition
31%Racial/ethnic minority
19%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
55%Grade A
45%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
1,083Total filings over 13 yrs
7.45%Avg annual filing rate
7.5%Peak (2012)
56Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year2004 to 2017
Filings dropped 33% over the past 13 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
219Total filings 2020-21
2.8Avg monthly (observed)
6.1Pre-pandemic baseline
0.46×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within North Hampton. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
12.9%Housing insecurity
9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
12.3%Food insecurity
9.7%SNAP enrollment
8.2%Transit barriers
6.7%No health insurance
17.7%Frequent mental distress
28.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in North Hampton
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Louis eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the St. Louis City County average of 5.8 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 29510114101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29510114101?
Census tract 29510114101 in the North Hampton neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 29510114101?
Median gross rent is $818/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 29510114101?
15.7% of residents in tract 29510114101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,757.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 29510114101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 18th, minority 31th, housing 19th.
Q5
Is tract 29510114101 considered part of North Hampton?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29510114101 fall within North Hampton (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29510114101?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,083 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 29510114101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.45% of renter households, peaking at 7.5% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 29510114101 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.46× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 29510114101 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 29510114101 compare to St. Louis overall?
Tract 29510114101 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of St. Louis at 3.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Louis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10
Was tract 29510114101 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in St. Louis
Top eight tracts in St. Louis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.