Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Eastside Eviction Risk: Lower , Great Falls

Tract 30013000100 · Cascade County, MT · pop 2,748 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

With a score of 3.2/10, tract 30013000100 in the Eastside area of Great Falls, MT reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,748 residents. Cost burden runs 20% here against 37.1% across Cascade County.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 24% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,233
Renter share30.3%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate12.8%
Median income$66,637

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Eastside
Elevated
Within parent city
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 19 tracts In Great Falls
Low
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 25 tracts In Cascade County
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#192 of 319 tracts In Montana
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Great Falls and the region

Centroid at 47.5223, -111.2269 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eastside scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Great Falls
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
12.8% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,121 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Great Falls
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Great Falls
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Great Falls
2.0

How Eastside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Eastside risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.2This tracttract 0001003.2Great Fallsparent city3.5Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Eastside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eastside

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.7/10.

At $1,121 a month, rents run 25% over what the rest of Great Falls commands. Severe burden reaches 9%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 5.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Cascade County average of 3.5 closely.

Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $66,637. 30% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 30013000100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30013000100?

Census tract 30013000100 in the Eastside neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30013000100?

Median gross rent is $1,121/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30013000100?

12.8% of residents in tract 30013000100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,748.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30013000100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 76th, minority 25th, housing 65th.
Q5

Is tract 30013000100 considered part of Eastside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30013000100 fall within Eastside (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30013000100 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30013000100 compare to Great Falls overall?

Tract 30013000100 scores 3.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Great Falls at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Great Falls

Top eight tracts in Great Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related