Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Eastside Eviction Risk: Lower , Great Falls

Tract 30013001100 · Cascade County, MT · pop 4,345 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 30013001100 sits in the Eastside neighborhood of Great Falls eviction risk, Montana eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 3.8/10. On the national scale it ranks #76,672 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 47% of renter households, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $928 a month while the average household earns $65,049 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 18% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,901
Renter share34.1%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$65,049

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Eastside
Low
Within parent city
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 19 tracts In Great Falls
Low
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 25 tracts In Cascade County
Moderate
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#131 of 319 tracts In Montana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Great Falls and the region

Centroid at 47.5000, -111.2226 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eastside scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Great Falls
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$928 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Great Falls
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Great Falls
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Great Falls
2.0

How Eastside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Eastside risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 001100Great Falls: 2.12.1Great Fallsparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 56

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Eastside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eastside

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 2.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cascade County average of 3.8 and in line with the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 56th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 30013001100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30013001100?

Census tract 30013001100 in the Eastside neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30013001100?

Median gross rent is $928/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30013001100?

10.9% of residents in tract 30013001100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,345.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30013001100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 79th, minority 26th, housing 70th.
Q5

Is tract 30013001100 considered part of Eastside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30013001100 fall within Eastside (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30013001100 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30013001100 compare to Great Falls overall?

Tract 30013001100 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Great Falls at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Great Falls

Top eight tracts in Great Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related