Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Eastside Eviction Risk: Lower , Great Falls

Tract 30013000200 · Cascade County, MT · pop 3,470 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 30013000200 covers the Eastside neighborhood of Great Falls, home to 3,470 residents. For landlords it grades 3.3/10, a lower reading. That is riskier than about 4% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 26% of renter households, a moderate level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $897 monthly, set against $66,496 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 15% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,608
Renter share21.0%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate13.1%
Median income$66,496

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Eastside
Elevated
Within parent city
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 19 tracts In Great Falls
Moderate
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 25 tracts In Cascade County
Moderate
Within state
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#121 of 319 tracts In Montana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Great Falls and the region

Centroid at 47.5133, -111.2528 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eastside scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Great Falls
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
13.1% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$897 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Great Falls
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Great Falls
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Great Falls
2.0

How Eastside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Eastside risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 000200Great Falls: 2.12.1Great Fallsparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 19

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Eastside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eastside

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 3.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cascade County average of 3.8 and below the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 19th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 30013000200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30013000200?

Census tract 30013000200 in the Eastside neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30013000200?

Median gross rent is $897/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30013000200?

13.1% of residents in tract 30013000200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,470.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30013000200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 26th, minority 4th, housing 20th.
Q5

Is tract 30013000200 considered part of Eastside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30013000200 fall within Eastside (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 30013000200 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 30013000200 compare to Great Falls overall?

Tract 30013000200 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Great Falls at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Great Falls

Top eight tracts in Great Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related