Eastside Eviction Risk: Lower , Great Falls
Tract 30013000200 · Cascade County, MT · pop 3,470 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 30013000200 covers the Eastside neighborhood of Great Falls, home to 3,470 residents. For landlords it grades 3.3/10, a lower reading. That is riskier than about 4% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 26% of renter households, a moderate level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $897 monthly, set against $66,496 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Great Falls and the region
Centroid at 47.5133, -111.2528 · click any tract to drill in
Why Eastside scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Eastside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 19
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 34%Socioeconomic
- 26%Household composition
- 4%Racial/ethnic minority
- 20%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Eastside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.6%Housing insecurity
- 7.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.8%Food insecurity
- 9.1%SNAP enrollment
- 7.6%Transit barriers
- 9.5%No health insurance
- 18.9%Frequent mental distress
- 33.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Eastside
The heaviest input here is economic stress at 3.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cascade County average of 3.8 and below the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 19th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
About tract 30013000200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30013000200?
What is the average rent in tract 30013000200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 30013000200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 30013000200?
Is tract 30013000200 considered part of Eastside?
What share of households in tract 30013000200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 30013000200 compare to Great Falls overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Great Falls
Top eight tracts in Great Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.