Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally

Kimco Industrial Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln

Tract 31109000400 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 5,891 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Tract 31109000400 covers the Kimco Industrial Park area of Lincoln in Nebraska. Home to 5,891 residents, it scores 5.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #42,756 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 63% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,002 monthly, set against $50,746 in average yearly household income, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 61% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 23% Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units2,114
Renter share61.4%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate35.6%
Median income$50,746

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Kimco Industrial Park
Moderate
Within parent city
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#7 of 76 tracts In Lincoln
Very High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#7 of 81 tracts In Lancaster County
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lincoln and the region

Centroid at 40.8298, -96.6825 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kimco Industrial Park scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
35.6% poverty · this tract
8.9
Supply constraint
$1,002 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0

How Kimco Industrial Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kimco Industrial Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 000400Lincoln: 3.13.1Lincolnparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.43.4Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,012Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 6.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.4%Peak (2006)
  • 55Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 311090004002002: 78 filings (6.71/100 renter HHs)2003: 77 filings (6.63/100 renter HHs)2005: 78 filings (7.37/100 renter HHs)2006: 89 filings (8.41/100 renter HHs)2007: 76 filings (7.18/100 renter HHs)2008: 79 filings (7.46/100 renter HHs)2009: 66 filings (6.23/100 renter HHs)2010: 61 filings (5.25/100 renter HHs)2011: 76 filings (6.09/100 renter HHs)2012: 74 filings (5.93/100 renter HHs)2013: 79 filings (6.33/100 renter HHs)2014: 58 filings (4.65/100 renter HHs)2015: 66 filings (5.29/100 renter HHs)2016: 55 filings (3.98/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kimco Industrial Park

What moves this score most is economic stress at 8.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Lancaster County average of 4.4 and above the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Part of this tract, about 8% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 31109000400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109000400?

Census tract 31109000400 in the Kimco Industrial Park neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 31109000400?

Median gross rent is $1,002/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 31109000400?

35.6% of residents in tract 31109000400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,891.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 31109000400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 82th, minority 65th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 31109000400 considered part of Kimco Industrial Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109000400 fall within Kimco Industrial Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109000400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,012 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109000400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.25% of renter households, peaking at 8.4% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 31109000400 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 31109000400 compare to Lincoln overall?

Tract 31109000400 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 31109000400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 8% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln

Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related