Central Park South Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln
Tract 31109000900 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 3,270 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 31109000900 sits in the Central Park South area of Lincoln eviction risk, Nebraska eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.7/10. It lands near the 28th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 53% of renter households, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,039 a month against an average household income of $46,651 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 62% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8257, -96.6628 · click any tract to drill in
Why Central Park South scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Central Park South compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 60%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 32%Racial/ethnic minority
- 79%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 7%Grade A
- 10%Grade B
- 37%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 352Total filings over 14 yrs
- 2.26%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.9%Peak (2008)
- 33Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Central Park South. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.2%Housing insecurity
- 6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.7%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 7.4%Transit barriers
- 8.5%No health insurance
- 16.4%Frequent mental distress
- 23.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Central Park South
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 4.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lancaster County average of 4.4 and above the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 31109000900
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109000900?
What is the average rent in tract 31109000900?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109000900?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109000900?
Is tract 31109000900 considered part of Central Park South?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109000900?
What share of households in tract 31109000900 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31109000900 compare to Lincoln overall?
Was tract 31109000900 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.