Central Park South Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln
Tract 31109000900 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 3,270 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 31109000900 covers part of the Central Park South area of Lincoln, NE, and scores 4.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,270 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8257, -96.6628 · click any tract to drill in
Why Central Park South scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Central Park South compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 60%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 32%Racial/ethnic minority
- 79%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 7%Grade A
- 10%Grade B
- 37%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 352Total filings over 14 yrs
- 2.26%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.9%Peak (2008)
- 33Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Central Park South. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.2%Housing insecurity
- 6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.7%Food insecurity
- 8.0%SNAP enrollment
- 7.4%Transit barriers
- 8.5%No health insurance
- 16.4%Frequent mental distress
- 23.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Central Park South
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Cost burden runs 53% here against 43.9% across Lancaster County. Severe burden reaches 17%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
It sits 1.1 points above the Lancaster County average of 3.8. The filing record is not thin: 352 evictions over 14 years of observation.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 3/10. SNAP participation runs 8.0% against 15.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2008, when 3.9% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 2.3% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NE average is 3.7, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Average gross rent is $1,039, close to the Lincoln average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 31109000900
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109000900?
What is the average rent in tract 31109000900?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109000900?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109000900?
Is tract 31109000900 considered part of Central Park South?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109000900?
What share of households in tract 31109000900 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31109000900 compare to Lincoln overall?
Was tract 31109000900 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.