Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Eastridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Lincoln
Tract 31109001301 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 3,632 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 31109001301 in the Eastridge area of Lincoln, NE reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,632. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15%
Stable renters 19%
Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,658
Renter share33.8%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$82,167
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
37
th percentile
Low
Within county
23
th percentile
Low
Within state
35
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8060, -96.6343 · click any tract to drill in
Why Eastridge scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,169 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0
How Eastridge compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 11%Socioeconomic
- 48%Household composition
- 11%Racial/ethnic minority
- 53%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 49Total filings over 13 yrs
- 0.56%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.7%Peak (2008)
- 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.0%Housing insecurity
- 3.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.0%Food insecurity
- 3.9%SNAP enrollment
- 3.8%Transit barriers
- 6.0%No health insurance
- 10.5%Frequent mental distress
- 26.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Eastridge
The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.3/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
Food insecurity runs 6.0% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 3.9% against 15.2% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 49 evictions over 13 years of observation. It sits 0.8 points below the Lancaster County average of 3.8.
Filings peaked in 2008 at 1.7% of renter households. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lincoln. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 0.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.2/10. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $82,167, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 31109001301
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109001301?
Census tract 31109001301 in the Eastridge neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31109001301?
Median gross rent is $1,169/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109001301?
5.1% of residents in tract 31109001301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,632.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109001301?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 48th, minority 11th, housing 53th.
Q5
Is tract 31109001301 considered part of Eastridge?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109001301 fall within Eastridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109001301?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 49 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 31109001301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.56% of renter households, peaking at 1.7% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31109001301 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31109001301 compare to Lincoln overall?
Tract 31109001301 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 31109001301 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NE
H.J.B. Industrial Park
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Cather
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Hillsdale
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Kimco Industrial Park
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Telegraph District
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Makers Row
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Downtown
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Related