Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Fair Hill Eviction Risk: Lower , Lincoln
Tract 31109001600 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 5,439 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Tract 31109001600 sits in the Fair Hill area of Lincoln eviction risk, NE, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.8/10. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,661
Renter share40.2%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate11.5%
Median income$71,318
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
51
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
53
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
65
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8065, -96.6728 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fair Hill scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
11.5% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,123 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0
How Fair Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 45%Socioeconomic
- 55%Household composition
- 23%Racial/ethnic minority
- 10%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 51%Grade A
- 23%Grade B
- 8%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 570Total filings over 14 yrs
- 4.20%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.7%Peak (2006)
- 31Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 35% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.5%Housing insecurity
- 5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.8%Food insecurity
- 7.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.9%Transit barriers
- 7.6%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 23.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fair Hill
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Court records carry 570 eviction filings across 14 observed years.
SNAP participation runs 7.0% against 15.2% nationally. Running cool, economic stress reads 2.9/10.
Food insecurity runs 9.8% against 17.8% nationally. Filings peaked in 2006 at 5.7% of renter households.
This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lincoln. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.2% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 3.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
40% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Lancaster County average of 3.8 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 31109001600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109001600?
Census tract 31109001600 in the Fair Hill neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31109001600?
Median gross rent is $1,123/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109001600?
11.5% of residents in tract 31109001600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,439.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109001600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 55th, minority 23th, housing 10th.
Q5
Is tract 31109001600 considered part of Fair Hill?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109001600 fall within Fair Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109001600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 570 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109001600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.20% of renter households, peaking at 5.7% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31109001600 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31109001600 compare to Lincoln overall?
Tract 31109001600 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Lincoln at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 31109001600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NE
Cather
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Kimco Industrial Park
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Hillsdale
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Telegraph District
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Makers Row
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Downtown
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Related