Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally
Field and Holmes Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln
Tract 31109002100 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 2,483 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 31109002100 covers the Field and Holmes neighborhood of Lincoln in Nebraska. Home to 2,483 residents, it scores 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 32% of US census tracts.
About 45% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 37% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $898 a month while the average household earns $42,039 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 64% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29%
Stable renters 35%
Owners 36%
Tract context
Occupied units1,072
Renter share63.8%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate24.8%
Median income$42,039
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
87
th percentile
High
Within county
86
th percentile
High
Within state
92
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8064, -96.7166 · click any tract to drill in
Why Field and Holmes scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
24.8% poverty · this tract
6.2
Supply constraint
$898 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0
How Field and Holmes compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 55%Household composition
- 55%Racial/ethnic minority
- 83%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 76%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 578Total filings over 14 yrs
- 8.69%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.4%Peak (2013)
- 23Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 45% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.9%Housing insecurity
- 10.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 22.6%Food insecurity
- 17.1%SNAP enrollment
- 12.0%Transit barriers
- 15.9%No health insurance
- 18.3%Frequent mental distress
- 31.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Field and Holmes
The heaviest input here is economic stress at 6.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Lancaster County average of 4.4 and above the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 578 eviction filings here over 14 tracked years, with about 8.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.4% of renter households in 2013.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 31109002100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109002100?
Census tract 31109002100 in the Field and Holmes neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31109002100?
Median gross rent is $898/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109002100?
24.8% of residents in tract 31109002100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,483.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109002100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 55th, minority 55th, housing 83th.
Q5
Is tract 31109002100 considered part of Field and Holmes?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109002100 fall within Field and Holmes (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109002100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 578 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109002100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.69% of renter households, peaking at 9.4% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31109002100 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31109002100 compare to Lincoln overall?
Tract 31109002100 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 31109002100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NE
Airspace
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
Telegraph District
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
Hillsdale
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
Downtown
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
Kimco Industrial Park
5.6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NE
H.J.B. Industrial Park
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related