Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Susan Eviction Risk: Lower , Lincoln
Tract 31109003402 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 6,263 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
31109003402 is a census tract in the Susan area of Lincoln, NE. It scores 3.8/10 for landlords. 31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units2,325
Renter share33.4%
SVI overall0.67
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$59,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
51
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
55
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
65
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8024, -96.7366 · click any tract to drill in
Why Susan scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,186 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0
How Susan compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 67
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 70%Socioeconomic
- 71%Household composition
- 36%Racial/ethnic minority
- 56%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 3%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 420Total filings over 14 yrs
- 4.80%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.3%Peak (2007)
- 33Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 43% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.5%Housing insecurity
- 8.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.2%Food insecurity
- 12.5%SNAP enrollment
- 8.8%Transit barriers
- 11.1%No health insurance
- 16.4%Frequent mental distress
- 27.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Susan
The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2/10. Cost burden runs 51% here against 43.9% across Lancaster County. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 420 filings here across 14 tracked years.
Average gross rent is $1,186, 9% above the Lincoln average. Filings peaked in 2007 at 7.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 4.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #52,479 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7/10.
It tracks the Lancaster County average of 3.8 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 31109003402
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109003402?
Census tract 31109003402 in the Susan neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31109003402?
Median gross rent is $1,186/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109003402?
8.1% of residents in tract 31109003402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,263.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109003402?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 67th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 71th, minority 36th, housing 56th.
Q5
Is tract 31109003402 considered part of Susan?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109003402 fall within Susan (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109003402?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 420 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109003402 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.80% of renter households, peaking at 7.3% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31109003402 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31109003402 compare to Lincoln overall?
Tract 31109003402 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Lincoln at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 31109003402 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NE
H.J.B. Industrial Park
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Cather
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Kimco Industrial Park
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Hillsdale
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Makers Row
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Telegraph District
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Related