Foreman Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Lincoln
Tract 31109003604 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 3,560 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 31109003604 covers part of the Foreman Ridge area of Lincoln, NE, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against Lancaster County at 43.9%, about one in five of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.7387, -96.7476 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foreman Ridge scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Foreman Ridge compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 9%Socioeconomic
- 29%Household composition
- 21%Racial/ethnic minority
- 46%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 38Total filings over 13 yrs
- 6.43%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.6%Peak (2013)
- 2Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.0%Food insecurity
- 3.9%SNAP enrollment
- 3.8%Transit barriers
- 5.3%No health insurance
- 11.1%Frequent mental distress
- 22.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Foreman Ridge
Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. Average gross rent is $1,405, 29% above the Lincoln average.
The voucher gap is 24.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
SNAP participation runs 3.9% against 15.2% nationally. Court records carry 38 eviction filings across 13 observed years. Against the Lancaster County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2013 at 6.6% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lincoln. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 31109003604
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109003604?
What is the average rent in tract 31109003604?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109003604?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109003604?
Is tract 31109003604 considered part of Foreman Ridge?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109003604?
What share of households in tract 31109003604 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31109003604 compare to Lincoln overall?
Was tract 31109003604 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.