Bakersville Eviction Risk: Lower , Manchester
Tract 33011001900 · Hillsborough County, NH · pop 3,359 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
With a score of 5.1/10, tract 33011001900 in the Bakersville neighborhood of Manchester ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,359 residents. That is riskier than roughly 42% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
51% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,513 a month while the average household earns $92,561 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 55% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Manchester and the region
Centroid at 42.9757, -71.4613 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bakersville scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Bakersville compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 67
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 79%Socioeconomic
- 7%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 4%Grade C
- 31%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.5%Housing insecurity
- 12.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 22.6%Food insecurity
- 18.0%SNAP enrollment
- 11.9%Transit barriers
- 14.4%No health insurance
- 19.4%Frequent mental distress
- 32.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Bakersville
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 4.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Manchester eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hillsborough County average of 4.7 and in line with the New Hampshire statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 67th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 31% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 33011001900
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33011001900?
What is the average rent in tract 33011001900?
What is the poverty rate in tract 33011001900?
How socially vulnerable is tract 33011001900?
Is tract 33011001900 considered part of Bakersville?
What share of households in tract 33011001900 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 33011001900 compare to Manchester overall?
Was tract 33011001900 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Manchester
Top eight tracts in Manchester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.