Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Piscataquog Eviction Risk: Moderate , Manchester

Tract 33011002000 · Hillsborough County, NH · pop 2,405 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

With a score of 5.4/10, tract 33011002000 in the Piscataquog area of Manchester, NH reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,405. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42% Stable renters 36% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units960
Renter share77.5%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate21.5%
Median income$42,271

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Piscataquog
Moderate
Within parent city
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 30 tracts In Manchester
High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 103 tracts In Hillsborough County
Very High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#30 of 349 tracts In New Hampshire
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Manchester and the region

Centroid at 42.9821, -71.4740 · click any tract to drill in

Why Piscataquog scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Manchester
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
21.5% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,255 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Manchester
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Manchester
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Manchester
3.5

How Piscataquog compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Piscataquog risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 0020004.0Manchesterparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Piscataquog

Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. This is renter territory: 78% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Set annual rent against average income of $42,271 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Against Hillsborough County at 45.2%, 54% of renters here are cost-burdened. It sits 1.4 points above the Hillsborough County average of 4.0. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.5/10.

Average gross rent is $1,255, 20% below the Manchester average. The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. SNAP participation runs 25.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 3/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 33011002000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33011002000?

Census tract 33011002000 in the Piscataquog neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 33011002000?

Median gross rent is $1,255/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 33011002000?

21.5% of residents in tract 33011002000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,405.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 33011002000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 80th, minority 54th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 33011002000 considered part of Piscataquog?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 33011002000 fall within Piscataquog (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 33011002000 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 33011002000 compare to Manchester overall?

Tract 33011002000 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Manchester at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Manchester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 33011002000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 29% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Manchester

Top eight tracts in Manchester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related