Lincoln Harbor Eviction Risk: Elevated , Union City
Tract 34017016500 · Hudson County, NJ · pop 4,642 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
34017016500 is a census tract in the Lincoln Harbor area of Union City, NJ. It scores 7/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,642 residents. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.4/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Union City and the region
Centroid at 40.7711, -74.0253 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lincoln Harbor scores 7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Lincoln Harbor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 90
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 66%Socioeconomic
- 87%Household composition
- 83%Racial/ethnic minority
- 97%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 408Total filings over 4 yrs
- 7.82%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.9%Peak (2018)
- 117Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lincoln Harbor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.3%Housing insecurity
- 10.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.3%Food insecurity
- 13.3%SNAP enrollment
- 10.9%Transit barriers
- 21.0%No health insurance
- 15.0%Frequent mental distress
- 29.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Harbor
This is renter territory: 76% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.3/10.
The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.6/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 21.0% against 11.3% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 408 evictions over 4 years of observation. It sits 0.7 points below the Hudson County average of 7.7.
The worst year on record was 2018, when 8.9% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 7.8% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 85% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 9.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 34017016500
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34017016500?
What is the average rent in tract 34017016500?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34017016500?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34017016500?
Is tract 34017016500 considered part of Lincoln Harbor?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34017016500?
What share of households in tract 34017016500 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34017016500 compare to Union City overall?
Was tract 34017016500 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Union City
Top eight tracts in Union City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.