Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Hayti Eviction Risk: Moderate , Durham
Tract 37063002300 · Durham County, NC · pop 2,228 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Tract 37063002300 sits in the Hayti area of Durham eviction risk, NC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10. Population here is 2,228. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39%
Stable renters 46%
Owners 15%
Tract context
Occupied units1,249
Renter share85.3%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate24.6%
Median income$71,343
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
86
th percentile
High
Within county
81
th percentile
High
Within state
92
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Durham and the region
Centroid at 35.9873, -78.9014 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hayti scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Durham
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
24.6% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,499 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Durham
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Durham
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Durham
4.5
How Hayti compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 80%Racial/ethnic minority
- 84%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 2%Grade C
- 86%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,637Total filings over 11 yrs
- 54.70%Avg annual filing rate
- 128.6%Peak (2005)
- 70Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 79% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.1%Housing insecurity
- 11.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.0%Food insecurity
- 18.3%SNAP enrollment
- 12.0%Transit barriers
- 12.2%No health insurance
- 18.8%Frequent mental distress
- 30.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hayti
This is renter territory: 85% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 8.1/10.
The poverty rate is 25%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. It sits 1.3 points above the Durham County average of 4.1.
Court records carry 1,637 eviction filings across 11 observed years. The worst year on record was 2005, when 128.6% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 54.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 37063002300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37063002300?
Census tract 37063002300 in the Hayti neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37063002300?
Median gross rent is $1,499/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37063002300?
24.6% of residents in tract 37063002300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,228.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37063002300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 41th, minority 80th, housing 84th.
Q5
Is tract 37063002300 considered part of Hayti?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37063002300 fall within Hayti (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37063002300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,637 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 37063002300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 54.70% of renter households, peaking at 128.6% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37063002300 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37063002300 compare to Durham overall?
Tract 37063002300 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Durham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Durham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 37063002300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 86% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Durham
Top eight tracts in Durham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NC
Annie Day Shepard Dormitory
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Annie Day Shepard Dormitory
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
L L Wilkins
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Duke Park
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
The Heights
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Crest Street
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Keene
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Old West Durham
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related
Explore the geography around tract 37063002300
Parent city ↑
Durham
4 / 10
Parent county ↑
Durham County
Parent state ↑
North Carolina
Sibling tract →
Annie Day Shepard Dormitory
5.4 / 10
Sibling tract →
Annie Day Shepard Dormitory
5.4 / 10
Sibling tract →
L L Wilkins
5.4 / 10
Methodology
How the score is built
Interactive map
Explore all 84k tracts