Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally

Rose Hill Heights Eviction Risk: Lower , Reynoldsburg

Tract 39049009383 · Franklin County, OH · pop 3,035 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 39049009383 covers Rose Hill Heights in Reynoldsburg in Ohio. Home to 3,035 residents, it scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 52% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 29% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $918 monthly, set against $70,057 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 50% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 35% Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,243
Renter share50.2%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate15.6%
Median income$70,057

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Rose Hill Heights
Low
Within parent city
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 10 tracts In Reynoldsburg
Elevated
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#200 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
Low
Within state
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1,584 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Reynoldsburg and the region

Centroid at 39.9484, -82.8237 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rose Hill Heights scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Reynoldsburg
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
15.6% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$918 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Reynoldsburg
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Reynoldsburg
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Reynoldsburg
5.5

How Rose Hill Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rose Hill Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.53.5This tracttract 009383Reynoldsburg: 2.82.8Reynoldsburgparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 833Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 13.64%Avg annual filing rate
  • 25.0%Peak (2005)
  • 78Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490093832002: 59 filings (12.29/100 renter HHs)2003: 70 filings (14.58/100 renter HHs)2004: 57 filings (11.88/100 renter HHs)2005: 95 filings (25.00/100 renter HHs)2006: 85 filings (22.37/100 renter HHs)2007: 74 filings (19.47/100 renter HHs)2008: 37 filings (9.74/100 renter HHs)2009: 36 filings (9.47/100 renter HHs)2010: 71 filings (13.98/100 renter HHs)2011: 45 filings (6.97/100 renter HHs)2012: 57 filings (8.82/100 renter HHs)2013: 69 filings (10.68/100 renter HHs)2015: 78 filings (12.07/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 32% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 418Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 12 filings (3.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 12 filings (2.40× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-07-01: 5 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2020-10-01: 11 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 9 filings (1.93× baseline)2021-01-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-03-01: 9 filings (2.45× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-08-01: 10 filings (2.14× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-10-01: 11 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-12-01: 10 filings (2.14× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-03-01: 7 filings (1.91× baseline)2022-04-01: 15 filings (1.80× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-07-01: 10 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-08-01: 10 filings (2.14× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-02-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 12 filings (3.27× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (0.90× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (0.91× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (1.36× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (2.45× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-06-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (1.28× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2026-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rose Hill Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill Heights

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Reynoldsburg eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Franklin County average of 5.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.00x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049009383

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049009383?

Census tract 39049009383 in the Rose Hill Heights neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049009383?

Median gross rent is $918/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049009383?

15.6% of residents in tract 39049009383 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,035.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049009383?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 73th, minority 54th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 39049009383 considered part of Rose Hill Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39049009383 fall within Rose Hill Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049009383?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 833 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049009383 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.64% of renter households, peaking at 25.0% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39049009383 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.00× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39049009383 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39049009383 compare to Reynoldsburg overall?

Tract 39049009383 scores 3.5/10, higher than the parent city of Reynoldsburg at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Reynoldsburg eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Reynoldsburg

Top eight tracts in Reynoldsburg ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related