Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Rose Hill Heights Eviction Risk: Moderate , Reynoldsburg

Tract 39049009386 · Franklin County, OH · pop 3,036 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 39049009386 covers the Rose Hill Heights neighborhood of Reynoldsburg, home to 3,036 residents. For landlords it grades 6.3/10, an elevated reading. It lands near the 82nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 50% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,137 monthly, set against $46,250 in average yearly household income, roughly 30% of income at the averages. Renters make up 85% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43% Stable renters 42% Owners 15%
Tract context
Occupied units1,283
Renter share85.3%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate24.4%
Median income$46,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Rose Hill Heights
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 10 tracts In Reynoldsburg
Very High
Within county
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#120 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
Elevated
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#894 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Reynoldsburg and the region

Centroid at 39.9370, -82.8201 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rose Hill Heights scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Reynoldsburg
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
24.4% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,137 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Reynoldsburg
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Reynoldsburg
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Reynoldsburg
5.5

How Rose Hill Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rose Hill Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 009386Reynoldsburg: 2.82.8Reynoldsburgparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,142Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 20.10%Avg annual filing rate
  • 27.2%Peak (2012)
  • 173Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490093862002: 132 filings (15.49/100 renter HHs)2003: 105 filings (12.32/100 renter HHs)2004: 108 filings (12.67/100 renter HHs)2005: 136 filings (18.56/100 renter HHs)2006: 183 filings (24.98/100 renter HHs)2007: 177 filings (24.16/100 renter HHs)2008: 201 filings (27.43/100 renter HHs)2009: 165 filings (22.52/100 renter HHs)2010: 147 filings (18.47/100 renter HHs)2011: 203 filings (21.83/100 renter HHs)2012: 253 filings (27.20/100 renter HHs)2013: 159 filings (17.10/100 renter HHs)2015: 173 filings (18.60/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 31% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,193Total filings 2020-21
  • 15.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 15.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.02×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 14 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-02-01: 6 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-03-01: 8 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.11× baseline)2020-09-01: 21 filings (0.98× baseline)2020-10-01: 10 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 17 filings (1.31× baseline)2021-01-01: 7 filings (0.45× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-03-01: 19 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-04-01: 8 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-06-01: 16 filings (1.12× baseline)2021-07-01: 13 filings (0.65× baseline)2021-08-01: 13 filings (0.68× baseline)2021-09-01: 17 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-11-01: 17 filings (1.55× baseline)2021-12-01: 16 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-02-01: 18 filings (1.13× baseline)2022-03-01: 21 filings (1.58× baseline)2022-04-01: 21 filings (1.58× baseline)2022-05-01: 23 filings (1.64× baseline)2022-06-01: 8 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-07-01: 14 filings (0.70× baseline)2022-08-01: 36 filings (1.89× baseline)2022-09-01: 15 filings (0.70× baseline)2022-10-01: 24 filings (1.03× baseline)2022-11-01: 25 filings (2.27× baseline)2022-12-01: 13 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 12 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-02-01: 42 filings (2.63× baseline)2023-03-01: 22 filings (1.65× baseline)2023-04-01: 9 filings (0.68× baseline)2023-05-01: 37 filings (2.64× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-07-01: 12 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-08-01: 22 filings (1.16× baseline)2023-09-01: 45 filings (2.11× baseline)2023-10-01: 27 filings (1.16× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2023-12-01: 31 filings (2.38× baseline)2024-01-01: 28 filings (1.79× baseline)2024-02-01: 26 filings (1.63× baseline)2024-03-01: 19 filings (1.43× baseline)2024-04-01: 15 filings (1.13× baseline)2024-05-01: 16 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-06-01: 22 filings (1.54× baseline)2024-07-01: 38 filings (1.90× baseline)2024-08-01: 33 filings (1.74× baseline)2024-09-01: 14 filings (0.66× baseline)2024-10-01: 23 filings (0.99× baseline)2024-11-01: 11 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 13 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 19 filings (1.21× baseline)2025-02-01: 13 filings (0.81× baseline)2025-03-01: 12 filings (0.90× baseline)2025-04-01: 19 filings (1.43× baseline)2025-05-01: 12 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-06-01: 20 filings (1.40× baseline)2025-07-01: 12 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-08-01: 11 filings (0.58× baseline)2025-09-01: 22 filings (1.03× baseline)2025-10-01: 12 filings (0.51× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-12-01: 9 filings (0.69× baseline)2026-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rose Hill Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill Heights

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Reynoldsburg eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Franklin County average of 5.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,142 eviction filings here over 13 tracked years, with about 20.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 27.2% of renter households in 2012.

In CDC survey modeling, about 24.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 19.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049009386

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049009386?

Census tract 39049009386 in the Rose Hill Heights neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049009386?

Median gross rent is $1,137/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049009386?

24.4% of residents in tract 39049009386 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,036.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049009386?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 96th, minority 86th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 39049009386 considered part of Rose Hill Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39049009386 fall within Rose Hill Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049009386?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,142 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049009386 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.10% of renter households, peaking at 27.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39049009386 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.02× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39049009386 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39049009386 compare to Reynoldsburg overall?

Tract 39049009386 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Reynoldsburg at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Reynoldsburg eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Reynoldsburg

Top eight tracts in Reynoldsburg ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related