Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Golden Park Place Eviction Risk: Lower , Lewisville

Tract 48121021722 · Denton, TX · pop 3,819 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 48121021722 covers part of the Golden Park Place area of Flower Mound, TX, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 18% Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,550
Renter share36.3%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$112,857

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Golden Park Place
Very Low
Within parent city
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 18 tracts In Lewisville
Moderate
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#121 of 193 tracts In Denton
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lewisville and the region

Centroid at 33.0449, -97.0565 · click any tract to drill in

Why Golden Park Place scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lewisville
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,773 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lewisville
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lewisville
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lewisville
4.1

How Golden Park Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Golden Park Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 021722Lewisville: 4.14.1Lewisvilleparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 373Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 11.49%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.5%Peak (2012)
  • 11Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481210217222001: 8 filings (4.34/100 renter HHs)2002: 22 filings (11.93/100 renter HHs)2003: 24 filings (13.01/100 renter HHs)2004: 36 filings (19.52/100 renter HHs)2005: 38 filings (23.20/100 renter HHs)2006: 40 filings (24.42/100 renter HHs)2007: 36 filings (21.98/100 renter HHs)2010: 47 filings (9.71/100 renter HHs)2011: 28 filings (4.93/100 renter HHs)2012: 54 filings (9.51/100 renter HHs)2013: 21 filings (3.70/100 renter HHs)2015: 8 filings (1.41/100 renter HHs)2016: 11 filings (1.73/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 38% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 38Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.72×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Golden Park Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Golden Park Place

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.1/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10. 15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Average gross rent is $1,773, 21% below the Flower Mound average. Cost burden runs 51% here against 45.5% across Denton County.

The filing record is not thin: 373 evictions over 13 years of observation. It sits 0.8 points below the Denton County average of 3.8. The worst year on record was 2012, when 9.5% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 11.5% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48121021722

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48121021722?

Census tract 48121021722 in the Golden Park Place neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48121021722?

Median gross rent is $1,773/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48121021722?

3.9% of residents in tract 48121021722 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,819.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48121021722?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 32th, minority 50th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 48121021722 considered part of Golden Park Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48121021722 fall within Golden Park Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48121021722?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 373 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 48121021722 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.49% of renter households, peaking at 9.5% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48121021722 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.72× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48121021722 compare to Lewisville overall?

Tract 48121021722 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Lewisville at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lewisville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lewisville

Top eight tracts in Lewisville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related