Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Golden Park Place Eviction Risk: Lower , Lewisville

Tract 48121021724 · Denton, TX · pop 4,153 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Census tract 48121021724 covers part of the Golden Park Place area of Flower Mound, TX, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against Denton County at 45.5%, 18% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 9% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,463
Renter share10.7%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$179,343

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Golden Park Place
Very Low
Within parent city
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 18 tracts In Lewisville
Very Low
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#126 of 193 tracts In Denton
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lewisville and the region

Centroid at 33.0294, -97.0479 · click any tract to drill in

Why Golden Park Place scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lewisville
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,571 rent vs county FMR
8.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lewisville
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lewisville
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lewisville
4.1

How Golden Park Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Golden Park Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 021724Lewisville: 4.14.1Lewisvilleparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 13Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 3.33%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.3%Peak (2005)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481210217242001: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2004: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2005: 4 filings (4.29/100 renter HHs)2006: 3 filings (3.21/100 renter HHs)2007: 1 filings (1.07/100 renter HHs)2010: 1 filings (2.33/100 renter HHs)2011: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (4.35/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (4.35/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (3.70/100 renter HHs)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 8Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.36×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Golden Park Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Golden Park Place

The voucher gap is 36.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.1/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8.6/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 13 filings here across 7 tracked years.

Average gross rent is $2,571, 15% above the Flower Mound average. The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Against the Denton County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. The worst year on record was 2005, when 4.3% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 3.3% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $179,343, annual rent is just 17%.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48121021724

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48121021724?

Census tract 48121021724 in the Golden Park Place neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48121021724?

Median gross rent is $2,571/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48121021724?

3.1% of residents in tract 48121021724 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,153.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48121021724?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 41th, minority 43th, housing 2th.
Q5

Is tract 48121021724 considered part of Golden Park Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48121021724 fall within Golden Park Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48121021724?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 13 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48121021724 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.33% of renter households, peaking at 4.3% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48121021724 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.36× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48121021724 compare to Lewisville overall?

Tract 48121021724 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Lewisville at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lewisville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lewisville

Top eight tracts in Lewisville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related